Cathedral of Praise Worship Center, Inc. v. Scottsdale Insurance Company
| Cathedral of Praise Worship Center, Inc. |
| Scottsdale Insurance Company |
| 0:2020cv61732 |
| August 25, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| William P Dimitrouleas |
| Alicia O Valle |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 REPLY to Response to Motion re #9 Defendant's MOTION to Compel Appraisal, to Stay Litigation, To Delineate and Itemize Appraisal, Award and to Strike Plaintiff's Claim for Attorneys Fees filed by Scottsdale Insurance Company. (Stern, Martin) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE to Motion re #9 Defendant's MOTION to Compel Appraisal, to Stay Litigation, To Delineate and Itemize Appraisal, Award and to Strike Plaintiff's Claim for Attorneys Fees filed by Cathedral of Praise Worship Center, Inc.. Replies due by 10/2/2020. (Pflueger, Cody) |
Filing 10
ORDER Referring Motion To Magistrate Judge. Motion #9 referred to Judge Alicia O. Valle. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 9/14/2020. See attached document for full details. (kpe)
|
| Filing 9 Defendant's MOTION to Compel Appraisal, to Stay Litigation, To Delineate and Itemize Appraisal, Award and to Strike Plaintiff's Claim for Attorneys Fees by Scottsdale Insurance Company. Responses due by 9/25/2020 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Stern, Martin) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Cody S Pflueger on behalf of Cathedral of Praise Worship Center, Inc.. Attorney Cody S Pflueger added to party Cathedral of Praise Worship Center, Inc.(pty:pla). (Pflueger, Cody) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time. Order denying as moot #5 Motion for Extension of Time. (Answer due 9/11/2020.) Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 9/2/2020. See attached document for full details. (kpe)
|
| Filing 6 Corrected MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer To Plaintiffs' Complaint by Scottsdale Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Stern, Martin) |
| Filing 5 Defendant's MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer To Plaintiffs' Complaint by Scottsdale Insurance Company. (Stern, Martin) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow recused. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle for all further proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow on 8/28/2020. See attached document for full details. (bms)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER Requiring Counsel To Meet, File Joint Scheduling Report And Joint Discovery Report. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 8/26/2020. See attached document for full details. (kpe)
|
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge William P. Dimitrouleas and Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (kpe) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Complaint) Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number FLSDC-13409728, filed by Scottsdale Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B)(Kammer, Ronald) No answer/motion to dismiss filed. Modified on 8/26/2020 (kpe). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
