Accident Insurance Company v. Guzman Construction, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Accident Insurance Company
Defendant: Guzman Construction, Inc. and Edwin Guiza
Case Number: 0:2020cv61931
Filed: September 23, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Rodney Smith
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 20, 2020 Filing 7 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Accident Insurance Company. Edwin Guiza served on 9/30/2020, answer due 10/21/2020. (Tharp, Charles)
November 20, 2020 Filing 6 PAPERLESS ORDER by Clerk of Non-Entry of Default re #5 Motion for Clerks Entry of Default as to Edwin Guiza. Reason: Summons (Affidavit) Returned Executed - has NOT been correctly entered on the docket. Signed by DEPUTY CLERK on 11/20/2020. (ail)
November 19, 2020 Filing 5 Plaintiff's MOTION for Clerks Entry of Default as to Edwin Guiza by Accident Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Tharp, Charles)
September 24, 2020 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Edwin Guiza, Guzman Construction, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Summon(s))(ail)
September 23, 2020 Filing 3 Notice of Action/Publication filed by Accident Insurance Company. All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Summon(s), #2 Summon(s))(Tharp, Charles)
September 23, 2020 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodney Smith. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (amb)
September 23, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT For Declaratory Relief against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number AFLSDC-13569525, filed by Accident Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit)(Tharp, Charles)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Accident Insurance Company v. Guzman Construction, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Guzman Construction, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Edwin Guiza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Accident Insurance Company
Represented By: Yelena Shneyderman
Represented By: Charles Andrew Tharp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?