Stephens v. Kaplan Higher Education, LLC
Plaintiff: Carlos Stephens
Defendant: Kaplan Higher Education, LLC
Case Number: 0:2020cv62097
Filed: October 14, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: William P Dimitrouleas
Referring Judge: Lurana S Snow
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER SETTING TRIAL DATE & DISCOVERY DEADLINES,REFERRING CASE TO MEDIATION & REFERRING DISCOVERY MOTIONS TOUNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Jury Trial set for 12/13/2021 in Fort Lauderdale Division before Judge William P. Dimitrouleas., Calendar Call set for 12/10/2021 at 10:00 AM in Fort Lauderdale Division before Judge William P. Dimitrouleas. ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation. ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Lurana Snow for all discovery matters. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 12/4/2020. See attached document for full details. (mee)
November 23, 2020 Filing 5 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 26(f) by Kaplan Higher Education, LLC (Eisenberg, Susan)
October 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER REQUIRING COUNSEL TO MEET, FILE JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT AND JOINT DISCOVERY REPORT. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 10/26/2020. See attached document for full details. (mee)
October 19, 2020 Filing 3 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint re the Notice of Removal by Kaplan Higher Education, LLC. (Eisenberg, Arielle)
October 14, 2020 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge William P. Dimitrouleas and Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (mee)
October 14, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Complaint) Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number AFLSDC-13693276,no answer/affirmative defenses filed by Kaplan Higher Education, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State court complaint and filings, #2 Docket Sheet State court docket sheet, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Eisenberg, Susan)Text Modified on 10/14/2020 (mee).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stephens v. Kaplan Higher Education, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carlos Stephens
Represented By: Peter J. Solnick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kaplan Higher Education, LLC
Represented By: Susan Nadler Eisenberg
Represented By: Arielle Sara Eisenberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?