Moncada v. Homegoods, Inc.
| Daniel Moncada |
| Homegoods, Inc. |
| 0:2020cv62135 |
| October 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Rodney Smith |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
PAPERLESS ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART #8 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Answer to Complaint. Homegoods, Inc. shall respond to the Complaint no later than January 5, 2021. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 12/15/2020. (lbn)
|
| Filing 8 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint UNOPPOSED by Homegoods, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Young, Kevin) |
|
Filing 7
PAPERLESS ORDER GRANTING #6 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Answer to Complaint. Defendant's Response/Answer is due no later than December 18, 2020. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 11/19/2020. (lbn)
|
| Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer Plaintiff's Complaint by Homegoods, Inc.. Attorney Kevin M. Young added to party Homegoods, Inc.(pty:dft). (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Young, Kevin) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Daniel Moncada. Homegoods, Inc. served on 10/28/2020, answer due 11/18/2020. (Duran, Pelayo) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Homegoods, Inc. (jua) (jua). |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Homegoods, Inc. (bb) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodney Smith. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (bb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Homegoods, Inc.. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number AFLSDC-13726454, filed by Daniel Moncada. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Summon(s))(Duran, Pelayo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Moncada v. Homegoods, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Homegoods, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Kevin M. Young |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Daniel Moncada | |
| Represented By: | Pelayo M. Duran |
| Represented By: | Roderick Victor Hannah |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
