Trisura Specialty Insurance CompanyY v. Kanpai, Inc. et al
Trisura Specialty Insurance Company |
Clay Lewis and Kanpai, Inc. |
0:2020cv62142 |
October 21, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Roy K Altman |
Patrick M Hunt |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 27 SCHEDULING ORDER: ( Jury Trial set for 12/6/2021 in Fort Lauderdale Division before Judge Roy K. Ahttps://flsd-ecf.sso.dcn/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?580040ltman., Calendar Call set for 11/30/2021 01:45 PM in Fort Lauderdale Division before Judge Roy K. Altman., Amended Pleadings due by 1/27/2021., Discovery due by 8/9/2021., Expert Discovery due by 8/9/2021., Joinder of Parties due by 1/27/2021., Mediation Deadline 8/16/2021., In Limine Motions due by 9/21/2021., Dispositive Motions due by 8/24/2021., Motions due by 8/24/2021., Pretrial Stipulation due by 9/21/2021.) Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 12/16/2020. See attached document for full details. (kpe) #Pattern Jury Instruction Builder - To access the latest, up to date changes to the 11th Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions go to https://pji.ca11.uscourts.gov or click here. |
Filing 26 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 26(f) by Trisura Specialty Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Proposed Scheduling Order)(Chusid, Mitchel) |
Filing 25 Defendant's Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by Kanpai, Inc. (Thomas, Donald) |
Filing 24 Defendant's Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by Clay Lewis (Balkan, Adam) |
Filing 23 Plaintiff's Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by Trisura Specialty Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Origin Speciality Underwriters for Trisura Specialty Insurance Company (Chusid, Mitchel) |
Filing 22 First MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction #1 Complaint, Jointly by Kanpai, Inc., Clay Lewis. Responses due by 12/21/2020 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Thomas, Donald) |
Filing 21 PAPERLESS ORDER STRIKING #19 the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss because it does not comply with #5 Court Practices in Cases with Multiple Defendants, which require that all defendants either join in one motion to dismiss or move for leave to file separate responses. Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 12/4/2020. (drd) |
Filing 20 PAPERLESS ORDER STRIKING #17 the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss because it does not comply with #5 Court Practices in Cases with Multiple Defendants, which require that all defendants either join in one motion to dismiss or move for leave to file separate responses. Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 12/4/2020. (drd) |
Filing 19 STRICKEN Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint, for Lack of Jurisdiction by Kanpai, Inc.. Responses due by 12/18/2020 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Thomas, Donald) Modified on 12/7/2020 per DE 21 Order (kpe). |
Filing 18 ORDER Requiring Scheduling Report And Certificates Of Interested Parties. Joint Scheduling Report And Certificates Of Interested Parties are due by 12/21/2020. Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 12/4/2020. See attached document for full details. (kpe) |
Filing 17 STRICKEN Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction #1 Complaint, by Clay Lewis. Responses due by 12/18/2020 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Balkan, Adam) Modified text on 12/7/2020 per DE 20 Order (kpe). |
Filing 16 ORDER granting #12 & #14 Motion for Extension of Time. (Answer due 12/4/2020.) Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 11/18/2020. See attached document for full details. (kpe) |
Filing 15 Clerks Notice to Filer re #14 Defendant's MOTION for Extension of Time to respond to complaint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer . Motion with One Relief Filed as Multiple Reliefs; ERROR - The Filer selected multiple relief events when only one was necessary. The docket entry was corrected by the Clerk. It is not necessary to refile this document but future filings must comply with the instructions in the CM/ECF Attorney User's Manual. (ls) |
Filing 14 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint ( Responses due by 11/30/2020), by Kanpai, Inc.. Attorney Donald J. Thomas added to party Kanpai, Inc.(pty:dft). (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Thomas, Donald) Modified Text to Reflect One Relief/and add Link on 11/17/2020 (ls). |
Filing 13 Clerks Notice to Filer re #12 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time 20 days re #1 Complaint,. Wrong Motion Relief(s) Selected; ERROR - The Filer selected the wrong motion relief(s) when docketing the motion. The correction was made by the Clerk. It is not necessary to refile this document but future motions filed must include applicable reliefs. (ls) |
Filing 12 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint by Clay Lewis. Responses due by 11/30/2020 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Balkan, Adam) Modified Relief on 11/16/2020 (ls). |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Adam Mark Balkan on behalf of Clay Lewis. Attorney Adam Mark Balkan added to party Clay Lewis(pty:dft). (Balkan, Adam) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Trisura Specialty Insurance Company. Clay Lewis served on 10/29/2020, answer due 11/19/2020. (Chusid, Mitchel) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Trisura Specialty Insurance Company. Kanpai, Inc. served on 10/29/2020, answer due 11/19/2020. (Chusid, Mitchel) |
Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Clay Lewis. (nc) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) by Trisura Specialty Insurance Company re 3 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case, Summons(es), #1 Complaint, filed by Trisura Specialty Insurance Company (Chusid, Mitchel) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Kanpai, Inc.. (nc) |
Filing 5 ORDER Requiring Plaintiff to file Proof of Service. Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 10/21/2020. See attached document for full details. (jas) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) by TRISURA SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY re 3 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case, Summons(es), #1 Complaint, filed by TRISURA SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY (Chusid, Mitchel) |
Filing 3 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Summons(es) cannot be issued. The party(ies) on the summons(es) does not match the initiating documents (amb) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Roy K. Altman and Magistrate Judge Patrick M. Hunt. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Patrick M. Hunt is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (amb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number AFLSDC-13731937, filed by TRISURA SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Civil Cover Sheet, #9 Summon(s), #10 Summon(s))(Chusid, Mitchel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.