Curtis et al v. National Specialty Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Natalie curtis and Geoffrey curtis
Defendant: National Specialty Insurance Company
Case Number: 0:2020cv62203
Filed: October 29, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Roy K Altman
Referring Judge: Patrick M Hunt
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER Scheduling Mediation before John S. Freud Mediation Hearing set for 5/19/2021 01:00 PM Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 12/14/2020. See attached document for full details. (ebz)
December 14, 2020 Filing 13 Joint NOTICE of Mediator Selection and Hearing. Selected/Added John A. Freud as Mediator. Mediation Hearing set for Wednesday, May 19, 2021 at 1:00 p.m.. (Hendrix, Meryl)
December 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 PAPERLESS ORDER striking #11 Joint Notice of Selection of Mediator. Both the Scheduling Order #9 and the Order to Show Cause #10 instructed the parties to select "a time, date, and place for mediation." But the Joint Notice lacks all three. Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 12/11/2020. (drd)
December 11, 2020 Filing 11 STRICKEN per DE# 12 , JOINT NOTICE of Mediator Selection. Selected/Added John A. Freud as Mediator. (Hendrix, Meryl)
December 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Show Cause Response due by 12/11/2020. Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 12/9/2020. See attached document for full details. (ebz)
November 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 SCHEDULING ORDER: (Jury Trial set for 11/18/2021 before Judge Roy K. Altman., Calendar Call set for 11/12/2021 01:45 PM before Judge Roy K. Altman., Amended Pleadings due by 12/29/2020., Discovery due by 7/22/2021., Expert Discovery due by 7/22/2021., Joinder of Parties due by 12/29/2020., Mediation Deadline 7/29/2021., In Limine Motions due by 9/3/2021., Pre-trial Motions due by 8/6/2021., Joint Pretrial Stipulation due by 9/3/2021.), ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Patrick Hunt for all pretrial non-dispositive and discovery matters. Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 11/17/2020. See attached document for full details. (jas)
November 17, 2020 Filing 8 Amended SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 16.1 by National Specialty Insurance Company (Waite, Victor)
November 17, 2020 Filing 7 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 16.1 by National Specialty Insurance Company (Waite, Victor)
November 10, 2020 Filing 6 Plaintiff's Certificate of Other Affiliates and Corporate Disclosure Statement by Geoffrey Curtis, Natalie Curtis (Hendrix, Meryl)
November 9, 2020 Filing 5 STATUS REPORT by National Specialty Insurance Company (Waite, Victor)
November 2, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE IN REMOVAL CASES Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 11/30/2020. See attached document for full details. (ebz)
November 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER REQUIRING SCHEDULING REPORTAND CERTIFICATES OF INTERESTED PARTIES Joint Scheduling Report due by 11/20/2020 Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 10/30/2020. See attached document for full details. (ebz)
October 29, 2020 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Roy K. Altman and Magistrate Judge Patrick M. Hunt. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Patrick M. Hunt is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (ebz)
October 29, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Amended Complaint) Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number AFLSDC-13782479, filed by National Specialty Insurance Company. No Motion to Dismiss and/or Answer has been attached. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Amended Complaint, #3 Exhibit Affidavit of Corporate Rep, #4 Exhibit Defendant's RFA to Plaintiffs, #5 Exhibit Plaintiffs' Responses to RFA, #6 Exhibit Index of Records, #7 Exhibit Notice to Circuit Court)(Waite, Victor)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Curtis et al v. National Specialty Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Natalie curtis
Represented By: Meryl Hoffman Hendrix
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Geoffrey curtis
Represented By: Meryl Hoffman Hendrix
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: National Specialty Insurance Company
Represented By: Victor H Waite
Represented By: Brian Patrick Henry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?