PETERSEN v. Gucci America, Inc.
Plaintiff: AISHIA PETERSEN
Defendant: Gucci America, Inc.
Case Number: 0:2020cv62333
Filed: November 16, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Raag Singhal
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. This cause shall stand DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each party shall bear its own fees and costs. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case and DENY AS MOOT any pending motions. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 12/21/2020. See attached document for full details. (ebz)
December 20, 2020 Filing 6 STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice by AISHIA PETERSEN (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Barros, Acacia)
November 23, 2020 Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by AISHIA PETERSEN. Gucci America, Inc. waiver sent on 11/23/2020, answer due 1/22/2021. (Barros, Acacia)
November 20, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICEUnless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion, legal memorandum, brief, and otherwise shall: be double-spaced, in justified alignment, in 12-point font, using either Times New Roman or Arial typeface. This Notice does not supplant the requirements and provisions of Local Rule 7.1(c). The Court cautions parties against excessive use of footnotes.Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions.Failure to comply with any of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 11/20/2020. (eca)
November 17, 2020 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Gucci America, Inc.. (ebz)
November 16, 2020 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Raag Singhal. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (ebz)
November 16, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTIVE RELIEF against Gucci America, Inc.. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number AFLSDC-13874072, filed by AISHIA PETERSEN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s) to be issued)(Barros, Acacia)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PETERSEN v. Gucci America, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gucci America, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: AISHIA PETERSEN
Represented By: Acacia Regina Silva Barros
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?