Sunfari Experiences, LLC v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's et al
Plaintiff: Sunfari Experiences, LLC
Defendant: Aspen Syndicate 4711, Barbican Syndicate 1955 and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's
Case Number: 0:2020cv62367
Filed: November 19, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Raag Singhal
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 11, 2021 Filing 11 RESPONSE to Motion re #6 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to 4 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer, #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), and in particular, Plaintiff's Unopposed Motio Def's Reply in Support of its Motion to Dimiss filed by Aspen Syndicate 4711, Barbican Syndicate 1955, Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's. Replies due by 1/19/2021. (Green, Marlin)
January 11, 2021 Filing 10 RESPONSE in Opposition re #8 Plaintiff's MOTION to Remand filed by Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's. Replies due by 1/19/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Pltf Amended Complaint)(Green, Marlin)
December 18, 2020 Filing 9 NOTICE by Sunfari Experiences, LLC re #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss (Martin, Farris)
December 18, 2020 Filing 8 Plaintiff's MOTION to Remand by Sunfari Experiences, LLC. (Martin, Farris)
December 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #6 Second Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 12/11/2020. (eyr)
December 11, 2020 Filing 6 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to 4 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer, #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), and in particular, Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Additional Extension of Time to File Its Response In Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss by Sunfari Experiences, LLC. (Martin, Farris)
December 3, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICEUnless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion, legal memorandum, brief, and otherwise shall: be double-spaced, in justified alignment, in 12-point font, using either Times New Roman or Arial typeface. This Notice does not supplant the requirements and provisions of Local Rule 7.1(c). The Court cautions parties against excessive use of footnotes.Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions.Failure to comply with any of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 12/3/2020. (pb00)
December 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #3 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to #1 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Response due by 12/11/2020. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 12/3/2020. (pb00)
December 2, 2020 Filing 3 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), by Sunfari Experiences, LLC. (Martin, Farris)
November 19, 2020 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Raag Singhal. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (mee)
November 19, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Complaint) Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number AFLSDC-13895540, no answer/affirmative defenses filed by Barbican Syndicate 1955, Aspen Syndicate 4711, Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A)(Green, Marlin) Text Modified on 11/19/2020 (mee).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sunfari Experiences, LLC v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aspen Syndicate 4711
Represented By: Cody Lane Frank
Represented By: Marlin Kareem Green
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Barbican Syndicate 1955
Represented By: Cody Lane Frank
Represented By: Marlin Kareem Green
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's
Represented By: Cody Lane Frank
Represented By: Marlin Kareem Green
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sunfari Experiences, LLC
Represented By: Farris James Martin, III
Represented By: James Weller Stroup
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?