Gomez v. GN Hearing Care Corporation
Plaintiff: Andres Gomez
Defendant: GN HEARING CARE CORPORATION
Case Number: 0:2021cv60005
Filed: January 4, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: William P Dimitrouleas
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER Approving #8 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal; Dismissing Case with prejudice; Closing Case. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 1/27/2021. See attached document for full details. (ls)
January 27, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Andres Gomez (Leal, Alberto)
January 11, 2021 Filing 7 First RESPONSE To order requiring certificate of counsel regarding any prior filings made under the ADA by Andres Gomez. (Leal, Alberto)
January 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER Requiring Certificate of Counsel Regarding Any Prior Filings Under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Plaintiff's counsel shall file with the Clerk of the Court the verified statement responding to the questions promulgated above on or before January 18, 2021. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 1/11/2021. See attached document for full details. (mc)
January 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER Requiring Counsel to Meet, File Joint Scheduling Report and Joint Discovery Report. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 1/11/2021. See attached document for full details. (mc)
January 6, 2021 Filing 4 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Andres Gomez. GN HEARING CARE CORPORATION served on 1/6/2021, answer due 1/27/2021. (Leal, Alberto)
January 4, 2021 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to GN HEARING CARE CORPORATION. (cds)
January 4, 2021 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge William P. Dimitrouleas. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (cds)
January 4, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against GN HEARING CARE CORPORATION. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-14144091, filed by Andres Gomez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Leal, Alberto)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gomez v. GN Hearing Care Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andres Gomez
Represented By: Alberto R. Leal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GN HEARING CARE CORPORATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?