Oseguera v. Twin Stone Designs and Installation, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Oscar Oseguera
Defendant: Mayra Parente, Twin Stone Designs and Installation, Inc. and Andy Medina
Case Number: 0:2021cv60213
Filed: January 27, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Darrin P Gayles
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 24, 2021 Filing 24 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 26(f) by Oscar Oseguera (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Saavedra, Nathaly)
March 22, 2021 Filing 23 Plaintiff's Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by Oscar Oseguera (Saavedra, Nathaly)
March 18, 2021 Filing 22 NOTICE of Compliance by Andy Medina, Mayra Parente, Twin Stone Designs and Installation, Inc. re #21 Response/Reply (Other) filed by Twin Stone Designs and Installation, Inc., Mayra Parente, Andy Medina, 8 Notice of Court Practice/to Appear/Other,,,,,,, (Avalos, Catalina)
March 18, 2021 Filing 21 Defendant's RESPONSE to #11 Statement Defendants' Amended Response to Plaintiff's Statement of Claim by Andy Medina, Mayra Parente, Twin Stone Designs and Installation, Inc.. (Avalos, Catalina)
March 17, 2021 Filing 20 Defendant's RESPONSE to #11 Statement of Claim by Andy Medina, Mayra Parente, Twin Stone Designs and Installation, Inc.. (Avalos, Catalina)
March 10, 2021 Filing 19 Defendant's Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement Defendant's Corporate Disclosure and Certificate of Interested Parties by Twin Stone Designs and Installation, Inc. (Avalos, Catalina)
March 10, 2021 Filing 18 Defendants' ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint with Jury Demand by Andy Medina, Mayra Parente, Twin Stone Designs and Installation, Inc.. (Avalos, Catalina)
March 4, 2021 Filing 17 NOTICE of Compliance with Court order by Oscar Oseguera re 8 Notice of Court Practice/to Appear/Other,,,,,,, (Saavedra, Nathaly)
February 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #14 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendants shall respond to the Complaint on or before March 10, 2021. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (hs01)
February 23, 2021 Filing 15 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Sarah Marie Leon on behalf of Andy Medina, Mayra Parente, Twin Stone Designs and Installation, Inc.. Attorney Sarah Marie Leon added to party Andy Medina(pty:dft), Attorney Sarah Marie Leon added to party Mayra Parente(pty:dft), Attorney Sarah Marie Leon added to party Twin Stone Designs and Installation, Inc.(pty:dft). (Leon, Sarah)
February 23, 2021 Filing 14 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint re #1 Complaint by Andy Medina, Mayra Parente, Twin Stone Designs and Installation, Inc.. Responses due by 3/9/2021 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Avalos, Catalina)
February 23, 2021 Filing 13 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Catalina M. Avalos on behalf of Andy Medina, Mayra Parente, Twin Stone Designs and Installation, Inc.. Attorney Catalina M. Avalos added to party Andy Medina(pty:dft), Attorney Catalina M. Avalos added to party Mayra Parente(pty:dft), Attorney Catalina M. Avalos added to party Twin Stone Designs and Installation, Inc.(pty:dft). (Avalos, Catalina)
February 18, 2021 Filing 12 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Oscar Oseguera. Mayra Parente served on 2/18/2021, answer due 3/11/2021. (Saavedra, Nathaly)
February 11, 2021 Filing 11 Statement of: Statement of Claim by Oscar Oseguera (Saavedra, Nathaly)
February 5, 2021 Filing 10 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Oscar Oseguera. Twin Stone Designs and Installation, Inc. served on 2/3/2021, answer due 2/24/2021. (Saavedra, Nathaly)
February 5, 2021 Filing 9 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Oscar Oseguera. Andy Medina served on 2/3/2021, answer due 2/24/2021. (Saavedra, Nathaly)
January 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE. The Complaint in this action is filed under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. 201 et seq. ("FLSA"). In order to assist the Court in the management of this case, and in an effort to foster early and cost-effective resolution, the parties are ORDERED to comply with the following procedures: Under Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a plaintiff is required to state a "short and plain statement of the claim." While this Rule places only a light burden on a plaintiff, the Court requires complaints filed under the FLSA to include, at a minimum, a statement setting forth the following with respect to each Plaintiff: (a) An initial estimate of the total amount of alleged unpaid wages; (b) A preliminary calculation of such wages; (c) The approximate period during which the alleged FLSA violations occurred; and (d) The nature of the wages (e.g., overtime or straight time). Plaintiff is directed to file a "Statement of Claim" by February 11, 2021. Plaintiff(s) shall promptly serve a copy of this Order, the Statement of Claim, and copies of all supporting documents (including time sheets, pay stubs, etc.) upon counsel for Defendant(s) once an appearance has been made or at the time the Statement of Claim is filed (if defense counsel has already appeared). Defendant(s) shall then file a "Response to Plaintiff's Statement of Claim" setting forth in detail any defenses to Plaintiff's claim(s) and serve copies of all supporting documents within twenty (20) days of being served with Plaintiff's Statement of Claim. Failure to comply with ANY of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including but not limited to, the dismissal of this action or entry of default. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (hs01)
January 28, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE. Unless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion shall be double-spaced in Times New Roman 12-point typeface. Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions. Failure to comply with ANY of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including but not limited to, the striking of the motion or dismissal of this action. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (hs01)
January 28, 2021 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Mayra Parente. (drz)
January 28, 2021 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Andy Medina. (drz)
January 28, 2021 Filing 4 Clerks Notice of Docket Correction re #3 Summons Issued. Document Restricted Due to Error; The correct document has been attached to this notice. (drz)
January 28, 2021 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Twin Stone Designs and Installation, Inc. (drz) Modified defendant's name per complaint on 1/28/2021 (asl).
January 27, 2021 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Darrin P. Gayles. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (drz)
January 27, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-14295186, filed by Oscar Oseguera. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Summon(s), #4 Summon(s))(Saavedra, Nathaly)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Oseguera v. Twin Stone Designs and Installation, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mayra Parente
Represented By: Sarah Marie Leon
Represented By: Catalina M. Avalos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Twin Stone Designs and Installation, Inc.
Represented By: Sarah Marie Leon
Represented By: Catalina M. Avalos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andy Medina
Represented By: Sarah Marie Leon
Represented By: Catalina M. Avalos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Oscar Oseguera
Represented By: Juan J. Perez
Represented By: Nathaly Saavedra
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?