The City of Pembroke Pines, Florida v. McKinsey & Company, Inc.
The City of Pembroke Pines, Florida |
McKinsey & Company, Inc. |
0:2021cv60305 |
February 5, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Rodolfo A Ruiz |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 Order Closing Case for Statistical Purposes and Placing Matter in Civil Suspense File. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 3/9/2021. See attached document for full details. (as03) |
Filing 11 NOTICE by McKinsey & Company, Inc. / Notice of Filing Motion to Transfer for Coordinated or Consolidated Pretrial Proceedings with The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. Attorney Brian C Frontino added to party McKinsey & Company, Inc.(pty:dft). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Motion for Transfer, #2 Exhibit B - Brief in Support of Motion for Transfer, #3 Exhibit C- Schedule of Actions, #4 Exhibit D - Complaints and Docket Sheets, #5 Exhibit E - Declaration of James L. Bernard, with Exhibit) (Frontino, Brian) |
Filing 10 Order Requiring Joint Scheduling Report and Certificates of Interested Parties. Joint Scheduling Report due by 3/19/2021. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 2/22/2021. See attached document for full details. (ls) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by The City of Pembroke Pines, Florida. McKinsey & Company, Inc. served on 2/19/2021, answer due 3/12/2021. (Young, James) |
Filing 8 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #7 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for attorney Matthew Browne. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 2/22/2021. (as03) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Matthew Browne. Filing Fee $ 200.00 Receipt # AFLSDC-14393806 by The City of Pembroke Pines, Florida. Responses due by 3/2/2021 (Young, James) |
Filing 6 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #5 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for attorney Juan Martinez. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 2/11/2021. (as03) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Juan Martinez. Filing Fee $ 200.00 Receipt # AFLSDC-14360167 by The City of Pembroke Pines, Florida. Responses due by 2/23/2021 (Young, James) |
Filing 4 Bar Letter re: Admissions sent to attorney Juan Martinez, Matthew Browne, mailing date 02/08/2021, (cco) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to McKinsey & Company, Inc. (mc) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (mc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT (Class Action) against The City of Pembroke Pines, Florida. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-14345624, filed by The City of Pembroke Pines, Florida. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Dearman, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.