CASTILLO v. B K WALLCOVERING, INC. et al
ANGEL B. CASTILLO |
HORACIO SAENZ-VIDAL and B K WALLCOVERING, INC. |
0:2021cv60314 |
February 9, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Raag Singhal |
Labor: Fair Standards |
15 U.S.C. ยง 0002 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER granting #9 The Joint Motion for In Camera Review and Entry of Order Approving Settlement and Dismissing with Prejudice. Re: #9 Joint MOTION for Settlement Approval filed by ANGEL B. CASTILLO. The Settlement Agreement and Mutual General Release between Plaintiff, ANGEL B. CASTILLO, and Defendants, B K WALLCOVERING, INC. and HORACIO SAENZ-VIDAL, is APPROVED in its entirety. This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case and DENY AS MOOT any pending motions. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 3/18/2021. See attached document for full details. (drz) |
Filing 9 Joint MOTION for Settlement Approval by ANGEL B. CASTILLO. Responses due by 3/31/2021 (Palma, Zandro) |
Filing 8 ORDER ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING CASE. The above-styled action is administratively CLOSED without prejudice to the parties to file a stipulation for dismissal within sixty (60) days of this Order. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case for administrative purposes only. Any pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 3/11/2021. See attached document for full details. (drz) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Settlement by ANGEL B. CASTILLO (Palma, Zandro) |
Filing 6 ORDER REQUIRING SCHEDULING REPORT, CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES, AND STATEMENT OF CLAIM AND RESPONSE IN FLSA CASE. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 3/10/2021. See attached document for full details. (drz) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICEUnless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion, legal memorandum, brief, and otherwise shall: be double-spaced, in justified alignment, in 12-point font, using either Times New Roman or Arial typeface. This Notice does not supplant the requirements and provisions of Local Rule 7.1(c). The Court cautions parties against excessive use of footnotes.Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions.Failure to comply with any of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 3/10/2021. (eca) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to HORACIO SAENZ-VIDAL. (drz) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to B K WALLCOVERING, INC. (drz) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Raag Singhal. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (drz) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against B K WALLCOVERING, INC., HORACIO SAENZ-VIDAL. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-14359542, filed by ANGEL B. CASTILLO. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Summon(s))(Palma, Zandro) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.