Davis v. Mednax Services, Inc.
| KASHARI DAVIS |
| Mednax Services, Inc. |
| 0:2021cv60347 |
| February 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Jose E Martinez |
| Rodney Smith |
| Lurana S Snow |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 Courtesy Copy of Motion to Transfer and Consolidate for Coordinated Pretrial Proceedings Under 28 U.S.C. 1407 filed before the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support, #2 Schedule of Actions, #3 Proof of Service)(mc) |
Filing 15
ORDER STAYING CASE,granting #12 Motion to Stay. Closing Case. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 3/1/2021. See attached document for full details. (mee)
|
|
Filing 14
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #13 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to #1 Plaintiff's Complaint. Defendant shall have through and including March 11, 2021 to answer the complaint. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 2/26/2021. (cvl)
|
| Filing 13 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint by Mednax Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Brown, Kristine) |
| Filing 12 Unopposed MOTION to Stay Proceedings Pending Action by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation by Mednax Services, Inc.. Responses due by 3/12/2021 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Brown, Kristine) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER SETTING CIVIL TRIAL DATE AND PRETRIAL SCHEDULE, REQUIRING MEDIATION, AND REFERRING CERTAIN MOTIONS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Jury Trial set for 2/14/2022 at 09:30 AM before Judge Jose E. Martinez., Calendar Call set for 2/10/2022 at at 01:30 PM before Judge Jose E. Martinez.), ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation. ( Mediation Deadline 12/16/2021.), ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow for all discovery matters. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 2/17/2021. See attached document for full details. (mee)
|
| Set/Reset Answer Due Deadline: Mednax Services, Inc. response due 3/1/2021. per DE 9 (cbr) |
|
Filing 10
PAPERLESS ORDER denying as moot #7 Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 2/17/2021. (cvl)
|
|
Filing 9
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #8 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Defendant shall have through and including March 1, 2021 to answer the Complaint. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 2/17/2021. (cvl)
|
| Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Mednax Services, Inc.. Responses due by 3/3/2021 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Order)(Feuer, Jonathan) |
| Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Mednax Services, Inc.. Responses due by 3/3/2021 (Feuer, Jonathan) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Kristine McAlister Brown on behalf of Mednax Services, Inc.. Attorney Kristine McAlister Brown added to party Mednax Services, Inc.(pty:dft). (Brown, Kristine) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE IN REMOVAL CASES. Status Report due by 3/3/2021. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 2/17/2021. See attached document for full details. (mee) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER OF TRANSFER. TRANSFERRING CASE to Judge Jose E. Martinez for all further proceedings, accepted and signed on 2/16/2021. Judge Rodney Smith no longer assigned to case Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 2/16/2021. See attached document for full details. (mee)
|
| Filing 3 Notice of Pending, Refiled, Related or Similar Actions by KASHARI DAVIS (Yanchunis, John) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodney Smith. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (kpe) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Kashari Davis v. Mednax Services, Inc.) Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-14379740, filed by Mednax Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G)(Goldberg, Martin) No answer/motion to dismissed. Modified text on 2/12/2021 (kpe). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Davis v. Mednax Services, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Mednax Services, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Jonathan Elan Feuer |
| Represented By: | Martin B. Goldberg |
| Represented By: | Kristine McAlister Brown |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: KASHARI DAVIS | |
| Represented By: | Ryan Dennis Maxey |
| Represented By: | John Allen Yanchunis, Sr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
