CONINE et al v. AIG PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY
Plaintiff: JEFFREY CONINE and CYNTHIA CONINE
Defendant: AIG PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY
Case Number: 0:2021cv60401
Filed: February 19, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Raag Singhal
Referring Judge: Alicia O Valle
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 1, 2021 Filing 10 Plaintiff's Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by CYNTHIA CONINE, JEFFREY CONINE (Jimenez, Senen)
March 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER SETTING TRIAL AND PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULE, REQUIRING MEDIATION, AND REFERRING CERTAIN MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. SCHEDULING ORDER: ( Jury Trial set for 2/28/2022 09:00 AM in Fort Lauderdale Division before Judge Raag Singhal., Calendar Call set for 2/25/2022 10:00 AM in Fort Lauderdale Division before Judge Raag Singhal., Amended Pleadings due by 5/16/2021., Discovery due by 11/4/2021., Expert Discovery due by 11/4/2021., Joinder of Parties due by 5/16/2021., Mediation Deadline 11/11/2021., In Limine Motions due by 1/14/2022., Dispositive Motions due by 11/19/2021., Motions due by 11/19/2021., Pretrial Stipulation due by 2/15/2022.), ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation. ( Mediation Deadline 11/11/2021.), ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle for Discovery Matters. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 3/17/2021. See attached document for full details. (amb) #Pattern Jury Instruction Builder - To access the latest, up to date changes to the 11th Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions go to https://pji.ca11.uscourts.gov or click here.
March 17, 2021 Filing 8 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 16.1 by AIG PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Medeiros, Crystalin)
March 5, 2021 Filing 7 Notice of NO Pending, Refiled, Related or Similar Actions by AIG PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY (Teebagy, Steven)
March 5, 2021 Filing 6 Defendant's Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed Rule 7.1 by AIG PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY (Teebagy, Steven)
February 26, 2021 Filing 5 Defendants ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint re the Notice of Removal with Jury Demand by AIG PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY. Attorney Steven Charles Teebagy added to party AIG PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY(pty:dft). (Teebagy, Steven)
February 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER REQUIRING SCHEDULING REPORT AND CERTIFICATES OF INTERESTED PARTIES. Joint Scheduling Report due by 3/17/2021. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 2/23/2021. See attached document for full details. (amb)
February 23, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICEUnless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion, legal memorandum, brief, and otherwise shall: be double-spaced, in justified alignment, in 12-point font, using either Times New Roman or Arial typeface. This Notice does not supplant the requirements and provisions of Local Rule 7.1(c). The Court cautions parties against excessive use of footnotes.Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions.Failure to comply with any of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 2/23/2021. (pb00)
February 19, 2021 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Raag Singhal. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (amb)
February 19, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT ) Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-14413698, filed by AIG PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B)(Medeiros, Crystalin) (No Answer/ Motion to Dismiss filed) Text Modified on 2/22/2021 (amb).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CONINE et al v. AIG PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JEFFREY CONINE
Represented By: Senen Antonio Jimenez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CYNTHIA CONINE
Represented By: Senen Antonio Jimenez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AIG PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY
Represented By: Crystalin C Medeiros
Represented By: Steven Charles Teebagy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?