Ramos v. United Glass Systems Corp. et al
Plaintiff: Walter Ramos
Defendant: United Glass Systems Corp. and Mark Leonard
Case Number: 0:2021cv60614
Filed: March 19, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Beth Bloom
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 0704
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER Administratively Closing Case upon #9 Notice of Settlement. Parties Motion for Settlement Approval and a Stipulation of Dismissal due 6/1/2021. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 5/10/2021. See attached document for full details. (ls)
May 10, 2021 Filing 9 NOTICE of Settlement by Walter Ramos (Levy, Chad)
March 31, 2021 Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Walter Ramos. Mark Leonard waiver sent on 3/24/2021, answer due 5/24/2021; United Glass Systems Corp. waiver sent on 3/24/2021, answer due 5/24/2021. (Levy, Chad)
March 29, 2021 Filing 7 Statement of: Claim by Walter Ramos re #6 Order Requiring Joint Scheduling Report (Levy, Chad)
March 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER REQUIRING SCHEDULING REPORT, CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES, AND STATEMENT OF CLAIM AND RESPONSE IN FLSA CASE. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 3/19/2021. See attached document for full details. (drz)
March 19, 2021 Filing 5 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Party(ies) Improperly Formatted. The Filer failed to enter the party name(s) in accordance with the CM/ECF Format for Adding Parties for Attorneys Guide. The correction was made. It is not necessary to re-file the document. (drz)
March 19, 2021 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Mark Leonard. (drz)
March 19, 2021 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to United Glass Systems Corp. (drz)
March 19, 2021 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Beth Bloom. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (drz)
March 19, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mark Leonard, United Glass Systems Corp.. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-14536269, filed by Walter Ramos. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Summon(s))(Levy, Chad)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ramos v. United Glass Systems Corp. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Walter Ramos
Represented By: David Mitchell Cozad
Represented By: Chad Evan Levy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United Glass Systems Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark Leonard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?