State of Florida v. Caruthers
| State of Florida |
| Gant Caruthers |
| 0:2021cv60848 |
| April 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Roy K Altman |
| Patrick M Hunt |
| Miller Act |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING CASE denying #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; Adopting #6 Report and Recommendations on #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Gant Caruthers, #6 Report and Recommendations,. Certificate of Appealability: No Ruling Closing Case. Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 6/3/2021. See attached document for full details. (pcs)
|
| Filing 7 Notice of Appeal/OBJECTIONS to #6 Report and Recommendations by Gant Caruthers. (hh) |
| Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Gant Caruthers recommending the Motion be DENIED and the case DISMISSED. Objections to R&R due by 5/27/2021 Signed by Magistrate Judge Patrick M. Hunt on 5/13/2021. See attached document for full details. (hhr) |
| Filing 5 Judicial Notice in the Nature of Writ of Coram Non Judice & A Demand for Dismissal & Objection For Lack of Jurisdiction re #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), by Gant Caruthers. Responses due by 5/19/2021 (pcs) |
| Filing 4 Consent by Pro Se Litigant (Non-Prisoner) Gant Caruthers to receive Notices of Electronic Filing at email address: cgant4@gmail.com (pcs) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Gant Caruthers. (drz) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Roy K. Altman and Magistrate Judge Patrick M. Hunt. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Patrick M. Hunt is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (drz) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT ) Filing fee $402.00. IFP Filed, filed by Gant Caruthers. ( No Answer, Affirmative Defenses or Motion to Dismiss filed in State Court) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Bill of Complaint in Equity)(drz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: State of Florida v. Caruthers | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Gant Caruthers | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: State of Florida | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
