Saks v. CCS - South Florida LLC
| Allen Saks |
| CCS - South Florida LLC doing business as Complete Collection Service |
| 0:2021cv60927 |
| April 30, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Rodney Smith |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER REQUIRING JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT, CERTIFICATES OF INTERESTED PARTIES AND CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS. Joint Scheduling Report due by 8/2/2021. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 6/3/2021. See attached document for full details. (lbc)
|
|
Filing 7
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Answer to a Complaint or Other Case Initiating Document CCS - South Florida LLC. Answer due 6/21/2021. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 6/3/2021. (tcl)
|
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by CCS - South Florida LLC identifying Corporate Parent Acclara Solutions Group, LLC for CCS - South Florida LLC (Canter, Ronald) |
| Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint by CCS - South Florida LLC. Attorney Ronald S. Canter added to party CCS - South Florida LLC(pty:dft). (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Canter, Ronald) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Allen Saks. CCS - South Florida LLC served on 5/4/2021, answer due 5/25/2021. (Zeig, Justin) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to CCS - South Florida LLC. (mee) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodney Smith. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (mee) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CCS - South Florida LLC. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-14649882, filed by Allen Saks. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summon(s))(Zeig, Justin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Saks v. CCS - South Florida LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CCS - South Florida LLC doing business as Complete Collection Service | |
| Represented By: | Ronald S. Canter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Allen Saks | |
| Represented By: | Justin E. Zeig |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
