Cohan v. Mod Super Fast Pizza, LLC
| Howard Cohan |
| Mod Super Fast Pizza, LLC doing business as MOD Pizza |
| 0:2021cv61331 |
| June 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Rodney Smith |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #7 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. Defendant shall file its response by August 30, 2021. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 8/23/2021. (cbn)
|
| Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint by Mod Super Fast Pizza, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Doud, Kimberly) |
|
Filing 6
Order Requiring Joint Scheduling Report, Certificates of Interested Parties and Corporate Disclosure Statements. Joint Scheduling Report due by 9/10/2021. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 7/26/2021. See attached document for full details. (ls)
|
|
Filing 5
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #4 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. Defendant shall file its response by August 23, 2021. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 7/26/2021. (cbn)
|
| Filing 4 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint by Mod Super Fast Pizza, LLC. Attorney Kimberly J. Doud added to party Mod Super Fast Pizza, LLC(pty:dft). (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Doud, Kimberly) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Mod Super Fast Pizza, LLC. (bb) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodney Smith. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (pes) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mod Super Fast Pizza, LLC. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-14801416, filed by Howard Cohan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Weiss, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cohan v. Mod Super Fast Pizza, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Howard Cohan | |
| Represented By: | Jason Stuart Weiss |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Mod Super Fast Pizza, LLC doing business as MOD Pizza | |
| Represented By: | Kimberly J. Doud |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
