De Oliveira Neto v. MAYORKAS et al
Plaintiff: Carlos De Oliveira Neto
Defendant: SECRETARY Alejandro MAYORKAS and Director
Case Number: 0:2021cv61397
Filed: July 8, 2021
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 0551
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 8, 2021 Filing 5 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Case administratively closed - Wrong Venue selected (BROWARD) by Filer. CASE HAS BEEN RENUMBERED, the new case number is 21-22464-CIV-KING/BECERRA. No further entries will be made on this case. (jc)
July 8, 2021 Filing 4 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Summons(es) cannot be issued. The party(ies) on the summons(es)re: directors, Mariley Cala Crespo does not match the initiating documents. Modified text on 7/8/2021 (mee).
July 8, 2021 Filing 3 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Parties Not Added. The Filer failed to add all parties associated with the case. Filer is instructed to add the additional parties by filing a Notice of Entry of Parties. It is not necessary to re-file this document. (mee)
July 8, 2021 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge William P. Dimitrouleas and Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (mee)
July 8, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-14829063, filed by Carlos De Oliveira Neto. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet civil cover sheet, #2 Summon(s) summons atty gen, #3 Summon(s) summons field office dir, #4 Summon(s) summons us atty, #5 Summon(s) summons usdhs, #6 Exhibit Ex A - Receipts, #7 Exhibit Ex B - case status)Case restricted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2. (Soto, Eduardo)
July 8, 2021 Judge William P. Dimitrouleas and Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow no longer assigned to case. (jc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: De Oliveira Neto v. MAYORKAS et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carlos De Oliveira Neto
Represented By: Eduardo Rigoberto Soto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SECRETARY Alejandro MAYORKAS
Represented By: Noticing INS Attorney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Director
Represented By: Noticing INS Attorney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?