ALUSHANI v. ICS GROUP, LLC et al
| MATILDA ALUSHANI |
| ICS GROUP, LLC, DENISSE BETANCOURT, DANTE A. ALVAREZ and ROBERT ROBINSON |
| 0:2021cv61492 |
| July 21, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Rodney Smith |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. § 0206 Collect Unpaid Wages |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 NOTICE by MATILDA ALUSHANI re 22 Order to Show Cause,,,,, Previously Awarded Fees and Costs (Norell, Robert) |
| Filing 23 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by MATILDA ALUSHANI re 22 Order to Show Cause,,,,, (Norell, Robert) |
Filing 22
PAPERLESS ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND ORDER REQUIRING NOTICE OF PREVIOUSLY AWARDED FEES AND COSTS. This cause is before this Court upon #21 Plaintiff's Counsel's Supplemental Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Reasonable Expenses of Litigation (the "Motion"). The Motion was referred to the undersigned for appropriate resolution. ECF Nos. #19 at 6. A response to the Motion was due on June 23, 2022. To date, Defendant has failed to respond. Accordingly, having reviewed the Motion, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that within seven (7) days from the date of this Order:1. Defendant must show cause why the Motion should not be granted. Failure to timely comply with this Order may lead to recommending that the Motion be granted by default; and 2. Counsel for Plaintiff must file a Notice of Previously Awarded Fees and Costs (the "Notice"). The Notice shall include the following: (i) the case name and number of all federal cases decided in the Southern District of Florida within the past two years in which Plaintiff's counsel was awarded attorney's fees and costs; (ii) the date of the award(s); and (iii) the hourly rate(s) awarded to the individuals identified in the Motion.Within 2 business days of this Order, Plaintiff must serve a copy of this Order on Defendant and file a Notice of proof regarding the same. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle on 6/27/2022. (sd01)
|
| Filing 21 Plaintiff's MOTION for Attorney Fees Supplemental by MATILDA ALUSHANI. Responses due by 6/23/2022 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Norell, Robert) |
| Filing 20 FINAL DEFAULT JUDGMENT in favor of MATILDA ALUSHANI against ICS GROUP, LLC, DENISSE BETANCOURT. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 5/20/2022. See attached document for full details. (ebz) |
|
Filing 19
ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION FOR FINAL DEFAULT JUDGMENT re #14 Motion for Default Judgment. Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default Final Judgment on her FLSA claim is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default Final Judgment on her FMWA claim and her breach of contract claim is DENIED. Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default Final Judgment on her request for attorneys fees and costs is DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiff may file a motion for attorney's fees and costs by June 9, 2022. The Court will enter a separate judgment. This case is CLOSED. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 5/19/2022. See attached document for full details. (ebz)
|
| Civil Case Terminated. Per DE #19 Order. Closing Case. (ebz) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE by MATILDA ALUSHANI re 15 Order Notice of Filing (Attachments: #1 Agreement) (Norell, Robert) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Striking by MATILDA ALUSHANI (Norell, Robert) |
| Filing 16 STRICKEN NOTICE by MATILDA ALUSHANI re 15 Order Notice of Filing (Norell, Robert) Modified per DE #17 NOTICE OF STRIKING on 4/5/2022 (ebz). |
|
Filing 15
PAPERLESS ORDER requiring Plaintiff to file a signed copy of her written employment contract in support of her Motion for Entry of Default Final Default Judgment by April 5, 2022. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 3/31/2022. (cbn)
|
| Filing 14 Plaintiff's MOTION for Default Judgment by MATILDA ALUSHANI. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Declaration of Damages, #2 Exhibit 2 - Detailed time and costs, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Norell, Robert) |
|
Filing 13
PAPERLESS ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. A Clerk's Default was entered against the Defendants on September 24, 2021. However, no motion for entry of final default judgment has been filed. Accordingly, by January 20, 2022, Plaintiff shall either file a motion for final default judgment against the remaining Defendants or show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Failure to timely respond to this order shall result in dismissal of this action. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 1/12/2022. (cbn)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER. Motion to Drop Party Defendants Dante Alvarez and Robert Robinson DE#10 is GRANTED. Defendants Dante Alvarez and Robert Robinson are DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 9/28/2021. See attached document for full details. (ebz)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER by Clerk of Entry of Default re #9 Motion for Clerks Entry of Default as to ICS GROUP, LLC, DENISSE BETANCOURT. Signed by DEPUTY CLERK on 9/24/2021. See attached document for full details. (ebz)
|
| Filing 10 Plaintiff's MOTION Motion to Drop Party by MATILDA ALUSHANI. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Norell, Robert) |
| Filing 9 Plaintiff's MOTION for Clerks Entry of Default as to DENISSE BETANCOURT, ICS GROUP, LLC by MATILDA ALUSHANI. (Norell, Robert) |
| Filing 8 Statement of: Claim by MATILDA ALUSHANI re #6 Notice of Court Practice/to Appear/Other,, Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge, (Norell, Robert) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER REQUIRING JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT, CERTIFICATES OF INTERESTED PARTIES AND CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS. Joint Scheduling Report due by 9/24/2021 Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 8/25/2021. See attached document for full details. (ebz)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE IN FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT CASES AND REFERRAL TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND FAIRNESS HEARING Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle for Settlement Conference and Fairness Hearing. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 8/25/2021. See attached document for full details. (ebz) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by MATILDA ALUSHANI. DENISSE BETANCOURT served on 7/29/2021, answer due 8/19/2021. (Norell, Robert) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by MATILDA ALUSHANI. ICS GROUP, LLC served on 7/29/2021, answer due 8/19/2021. (Norell, Robert) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to DANTE A. ALVAREZ, DENISSE BETANCOURT, ICS GROUP, LLC, ROBERT ROBINSON. (Attachments: #1 Summon(s), #2 Summon(s), #3 Summon(s))(ebz) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodney Smith. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (ebz) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-14864852, filed by MATILDA ALUSHANI. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Summon(s), #4 Summon(s), #5 Summon(s))(Norell, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
