TAVERAS v. HYATT CORPORATION et al
Plaintiff: FREDERICK TAVERAS
Defendant: STAFF PRO WORKFORCE, LLC, HYATT CORPORATION and STAFF PRO, LLC
Case Number: 0:2021cv61564
Filed: July 29, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Rodney Smith
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 0201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 24, 2021 Filing 14 Plaintiff's Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by FREDERICK TAVERAS (Peterson, James)
September 24, 2021 Filing 13 Notice and Consent to Jurisdiction US Magistrate Judge signed by all parties . Filed by FREDERICK TAVERAS (Peterson, James)
September 24, 2021 Filing 12 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by HYATT CORPORATION, STAFF PRO WORKFORCE, LLC identifying Corporate Parent "H" for HYATT CORPORATION (Crow, Heather)
September 24, 2021 Filing 11 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 16.1 by FREDERICK TAVERAS (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Peterson, James)
September 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 PAPERLESS ORDER GRANTING #8 Defendants Staff Pro Workforce, LLC's and Hyatt Corporation's Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to File Answer or Other Responsive Pleading. Defendants shall respond to the Complaint no later than September 30, 2021. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 9/21/2021. (zgs)
September 15, 2021 Filing 9 Statement of: Claim by FREDERICK TAVERAS re #6 Notice of Court Practice/to Appear/Other, Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge, Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings (Peterson, James)
September 15, 2021 Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint by HYATT CORPORATION, STAFF PRO WORKFORCE, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Crow, Heather)
September 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER REQUIRING JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT, CERTIFICATES OF INTERESTED PARTIES AND CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS. Joint Scheduling Report & Certificates of Interested Parties due by 9/24/2021. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 9/1/2021. See attached document for full details. (jao)
September 1, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE IN FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT CASES AND REFERRAL TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND FAIRNESS HEARING. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 9/1/2021. See attached document for full details. (jao)
August 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 PAPERLESS ORDER GRANTING #4 Defendant Staff Pro Workforce, LLC's Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to File Answer or Other Responsive Pleadings. Defendants shall respond to the Complaint no later than September 16, 2021. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 8/24/2021. (zgs)
August 23, 2021 Filing 4 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint by HYATT CORPORATION, STAFF PRO WORKFORCE, LLC. Attorney Heather Folsom Crow added to party HYATT CORPORATION(pty:dft), Attorney Heather Folsom Crow added to party STAFF PRO WORKFORCE, LLC(pty:dft). (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Crow, Heather)
July 30, 2021 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to HYATT CORPORATION, STAFF PRO WORKFORCE, LLC. (jao)
July 29, 2021 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodney Smith. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jao)
July 29, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-14886764, filed by FREDERICK TAVERAS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Summon(s))(Norell, Robert)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: TAVERAS v. HYATT CORPORATION et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: STAFF PRO WORKFORCE, LLC
Represented By: Heather Folsom Crow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HYATT CORPORATION
Represented By: Heather Folsom Crow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: STAFF PRO, LLC
Represented By: Heather Folsom Crow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: FREDERICK TAVERAS
Represented By: Robert Scott Norell
Represented By: James Allen Peterson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?