Rawls v. Apex Enterprises, LLC et al
| Kendario Rawls |
| Apex Enterprises, LLC, Everglades Partners LLC doing business as Keke's Breakfast Cafe and Ali M Ijmal |
| 0:2021cv61678 |
| August 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Darrin P Gayles |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 0201 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 RESPONSE to #10 Statement of Claim by Apex Enterprises, LLC, Everglades Partners LLC, Ali M Ijmal. (Ershock, Alex) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Amended Complaint with Jury Demand by Apex Enterprises, LLC, Everglades Partners LLC, Ali M Ijmal. (Ershock, Alex) |
| Filing 10 Statement of: Claim by Kendario Rawls re 6 Notice of Court Practice/to Appear/Other,,,,,,, (Hunt, Daniel) |
| Filing 9 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Apex Enterprises, LLC, Everglades Partners LLC, Ali M Ijmal filed in response to Order Granting Motion for Leave, filed by Kendario Rawls.(Hunt, Daniel) |
Filing 8
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #4 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to File an Amended Complaint and Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint. Pursuant to Local Rule 15.1, Plaintiff shall separately refile its amended complaint on or before August 27, 2021. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (mcy)
|
| Filing 7 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 16.1 by Apex Enterprises, LLC, Everglades Partners LLC, Ali M Ijmal (Ershock, Alex) |
|
Filing 6
NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE. The Complaint in this action is filed under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. 201 et seq. ("FLSA"). In order to assist the Court in the management of this case, and in an effort to foster early and cost-effective resolution, the parties are ORDERED to comply with the following procedures: Under Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a plaintiff is required to state a "short and plain statement of the claim." While this Rule places only a light burden on a plaintiff, the Court requires complaints filed under the FLSA to include, at a minimum, a statement setting forth the following with respect to each Plaintiff: (a) An initial estimate of the total amount of alleged unpaid wages; (b) A preliminary calculation of such wages; (c) The approximate period during which the alleged FLSA violations occurred; and (d) The nature of the wages (e.g., overtime or straight time). Plaintiff is directed to file a "Statement of Claim" by September 7, 2021. Plaintiff(s) shall promptly serve a copy of this Order, the Statement of Claim, and copies of all supporting documents (including time sheets, pay stubs, etc.) upon counsel for Defendant(s) once an appearance has been made or at the time the Statement of Claim is filed (if defense counsel has already appeared). Defendant(s) shall then file a "Response to Plaintiff's Statement of Claim" setting forth in detail any defenses to Plaintiff's claim(s) and serve copies of all supporting documents within twenty (20) days of being served with Plaintiff's Statement of Claim. Failure to comply with ANY of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including but not limited to, the dismissal of this action or entry of default. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (mcy)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE. Unless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion shall be double-spaced in Times New Roman 12-point typeface. Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions. Failure to comply with ANY of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including but not limited to, the striking of the motion or dismissal of this action. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (mcy) |
| Filing 4 First MOTION to Amend/Correct the COMPLAINT by Kendario Rawls. Responses due by 9/7/2021 (Hunt, Daniel) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint re the Notice of Removal with Jury Demand to Amended Complaint by Apex Enterprises, LLC, Everglades Partners LLC, Ali M Ijmal. (Levine, Daniel) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Darrin P. Gayles. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (ail) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Complaint) Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-14924133, filed by Everglades Partners LLC, Apex Enterprises, LLC, Ali M Ijmal. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - State Court Complaint, #3 Exhibit B - State Court Amended Complaint, #4 Exhibit C - Consent to Removal, #5 Exhibit D - State Court Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Exhibit E - State Court Clerk's Certificate of Compliance, #7 Exhibit F - State Court Issued Summons-Keke's, #8 Exhibit G - State Court Issued Summons-Mahen, #9 Exhibit H - State Court Notice of Appearance, #10 Exhibit I - State Court Plaintiff's First Request for Production, #11 Exhibit J - State Court Docket)(Levine, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
