De La Cruz v. Bay Place Condominium Association
| Nadia De La Cruz |
| Bay Place Condominium Association |
| 0:2021cv61994 |
| September 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Beth Bloom |
| Civil Rights: Accommodations |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Compliance by Nadia De La Cruz re #8 Order, Set Response/Answer Due Deadline (Ittleman, Geoffrey) |
Filing 8
ORDER ON DEFAULT PROCEDURES. Bay Place Condominium Association Response/Answer to Complaint due 11/17/2021. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 11/10/2021. See attached document for full details. (jas)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Compliance with court order by Nadia De La Cruz re #5 Order, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit return of service) (Ittleman, Geoffrey) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Compliance with court order by Nadia De La Cruz re #5 Order, (Ittleman, Geoffrey) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER TO FILE PROOF OF SERVICE. Within seven (7) days of perfecting service upon Defendant, Plaintiff shall file proof of such service with the Court. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 10/26/2021. See attached document for full details. (pes)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER REQUIRING SCHEDULING REPORT AND CERTIFICATES OF INTERESTED PARTIES. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 9/23/2021. See attached document for full details. (jao)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Bay Place Condominium Association. (jao) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Beth Bloom. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jao) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for damages and demand for trial by jury against Bay Place Condominium Association. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15037403, filed by Nadia De La Cruz. (Attachments: #1 Summon(s) summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet civil cover sheet)(Ittleman, Geoffrey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: De La Cruz v. Bay Place Condominium Association | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Nadia De La Cruz | |
| Represented By: | Omid John Esmailzadegan |
| Represented By: | Geoffrey David Ittleman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Bay Place Condominium Association | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
