Khullar v. Rosario et al
Plaintiff: Divya Khullar
Defendant: Emmanuel Rosario, Adriana Rosario, STATE OF OREGON ex rel. ELLEN F. ROSENBLUM, Attorney General for the State of Oregon, OREGON STATE BAR, a public corporation of the State of Oregon, OREGON JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT, A Government agency of the State of Oregon and THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, a Federal Agency,
Case Number: 0:2021cv62007
Filed: September 23, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Raag Singhal
Nature of Suit: Racketeer/Corrupt Organization
Cause of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER REQUIRING SCHEDULING REPORT AND CERTIFICATES OF INTERESTED PARTIES. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 10/29/2021. See attached document for full details. (mee)
October 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #14 Defendant Oregon State Bar's Expedited Motion for Extension of Time to Appear. Defendant Oregon State Bar shall file its Response/Answer to the Complaint by December 15, 2021. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 10/29/2021. (jhy)
October 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #12 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Attorney Ankur Doshi; granting #13 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Attorney Nikhil Chourey. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 10/29/2021. (jhy)
October 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Reset Deadlines OREGON STATE BAR, a public corporation of the State of Oregon answer due 12/15/2021. Per DE# 16. (cqs)
October 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 Defendant's EXPEDITED MOTION For Extension of Time to Appear by OREGON STATE BAR, a public corporation of the State of Oregon. (Gregg, Robert)
October 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 Defendant's MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Nikhil Chourey. Filing Fee $ 200.00 Amended/Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filed - Filing Fees Previously Paid. See #9 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, by OREGON STATE BAR, a public corporation of the State of Oregon. Responses due by 11/12/2021 (Gregg, Robert)
October 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Defendant's MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Ankur Doshi. Filing Fee $ 200.00 Amended/Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filed - Filing Fees Previously Paid. See #10 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, by OREGON STATE BAR, a public corporation of the State of Oregon. Attorney Robert Edward Gregg added to party OREGON STATE BAR, a public corporation of the State of Oregon(pty:dft). Responses due by 11/12/2021 (Gregg, Robert)
October 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 PAPERLESS ORDER denying #9 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Attorney Nikhil Chourey; denying #10 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Attorney Ankur Doshi.Local Counsel is not a member of this Court's Bar. Attorney Christopher Sutter's bar member status in this Court is Government Exempt. Under Rule 4(d) of the Rules Governing the Admission, Practice, Peer Review and Discipline of Attorneys, as a government-exempt attorney, Mr. Sutter may only appear and participate in particular actions or proceedings on behalf of his employer in his official capacity. Under Rule 4(b)(1), local counsel must be a member of the bar of this Court.Notices of Termination delivered by US Mail to Nikhil Chourey and Ankur Doshi. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 10/28/2021. (jhy)
October 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Attorney Nikhil Chourey representing OREGON STATE BAR, a public corporation of the State of Oregon (Defendant); Attorney Ankur Doshi representing OREGON STATE BAR, a public corporation of the State of Oregon (Defendant) Activated. (pt)
October 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Defendant's MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Ankur Doshi. Filing Fee $ 200.00 Receipt # AFLSDC-15128592 by OREGON STATE BAR, a public corporation of the State of Oregon. Attorney Christopher M. Sutter added to party OREGON STATE BAR, a public corporation of the State of Oregon(pty:dft). Responses due by 11/10/2021 (Sutter, Christopher)
October 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Defendant's MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Nikhil Chourey. Filing Fee $ 200.00 Receipt # AFLSDC-15128540 by OREGON STATE BAR, a public corporation of the State of Oregon. Responses due by 11/10/2021 (Sutter, Christopher)
October 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Alias Summons Issued as to OREGON STATE BAR, a public corporation of the State of Oregon.(mee)
October 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) for Defendant OSB by Divya Khullar (Attachments: #1 Summon(s) Summon Oregon State Bar) (Khullar, Divya)
September 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Summons Issued as to OREGON JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT, OREGON STATE BAR, Adriana Rosario, Emmanuel Rosario, ELLEN F. ROSENBLUM, THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, a Federal Agency. (mee)
September 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) for all Defendants by Divya Khullar (Attachments: #1 Summon(s) SUMMON ADRIANA ROSARIO, #2 Summon(s) SUMMON EMMANUEL ROSARIO, #3 Summon(s) SUMMON OREGON ATTORNEY GENERAL, #4 Summon(s) SUMMON OREGON JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT, #5 Summon(s) SUMMON OREGON STATE BAR, #6 Summon(s) SUMMON USPTO) (Khullar, Divya)
September 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICEUnless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion, legal memorandum, brief, and otherwise shall: be double-spaced, in justified alignment, in 12-point font, using either Times New Roman or Arial typeface. This Notice does not supplant the requirements and provisions of Local Rule 7.1(c). The Court cautions parties against excessive use of footnotes.Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions.Parties are encouraged to seek extensions of time in a timely fashion. "A motion for extension of time is not self-executing; no motion is, unless expressly provided for by the applicable rule. Yet, by filing these motions on or near the last day, and then sitting idle pending the Court's disposition of the motion, parties essentially grant their own motion. The Court will not condone this." Compere v. Nusret Miami, LLC, 2020 WL 2844888, at *2 (S.D. Fla. May 7, 2020) (internal citations omitted).Local Rule 16.4, Local Rules for the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, requires that a Notice of Settlement "shall be filed and served jointly by counsel for all parties to the settlement." A unilateral notice of settlement will not stay pre-trial deadlines or hearings.Failure to comply with any of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 9/27/2021. (jhy)
September 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Venue on the Civil Cover Sheet does not match the initiating document. The Clerks Office confirmed Broward (Office - Ft Lauderdale) as the county with the filer. It is not necessary to re-file this document. (mee)
September 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Raag Singhal. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (mee)
September 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15039161, filed by Divya Khullar. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Khullar, Divya)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Khullar v. Rosario et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Divya Khullar
Represented By: Divya Khullar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Emmanuel Rosario
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Adriana Rosario
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: STATE OF OREGON ex rel. ELLEN F. ROSENBLUM, Attorney General for the State of Oregon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: OREGON STATE BAR, a public corporation of the State of Oregon
Represented By: Ankur Doshi
Represented By: Christopher M. Sutter
Represented By: Nikhil Chourey
Represented By: Robert Edward Gregg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: OREGON JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT, A Government agency of the State of Oregon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, a Federal Agency,
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?