Vega v. The First Liberty Insurance Corporation
Plaintiff: Esperanza Vega
Defendant: The First Liberty Insurance Corporation
Case Number: 0:2021cv62145
Filed: October 15, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Rodney Smith
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 3, 2021 Filing 13 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 16.1 by The First Liberty Insurance Corporation (Scott, Latasha)
November 18, 2021 Filing 12 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by The First Liberty Insurance Corporation identifying Other Affiliate R. Edson Briggs, Jr. for The First Liberty Insurance Corporation (Lavisky, Matthew)
November 17, 2021 Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Latasha Chanell Scott on behalf of The First Liberty Insurance Corporation. Attorney Latasha Chanell Scott added to party The First Liberty Insurance Corporation(pty:dft). (Scott, Latasha)
November 17, 2021 Filing 10 Clerks Notice to Filer re #9 Notice of Attorney Appearance. Document and Case Style Do Not Match; CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIRED - The Filer must File a Notice of Striking, then refile the document with the correct case style and case number in the appropriate case. Attorney Did Not Associate Themselves; ERROR - Filing attorney neglected to associate themselves to the case. The Clerk has added the attorney to the case. It is not necessary to refile this document future filings must comply with the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures and Local Rules by filing a Notice of Attorney Appearance and linking themselves to the case. (drz)
November 17, 2021 Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jeremy Fenton Tyler on behalf of Esperanza Vega (Tyler, Jeremy)
November 17, 2021 Filing 8 Clerks Notice to Filer re #7 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement,,. Other Affiliates/Corporate Parents Not Entered; ERROR - The Filer failed to enter all Other Affiliates/Corporate Parents from the Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement. Filer is instructed to refile their Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement and enter the missing Other Affiliates/Corp Parents. Note - Other Affiliates/Corporate Parents do not appear on the docket sheet. (drz)
November 16, 2021 Filing 7 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by The First Liberty Insurance Corporation identifying Other Affiliate Liberty Mutual Group Inc., Other Affiliate LMHC Massachusetts Holdings Inc., Other Affiliate Liberty Mutual Holding Company Inc., Other Affiliate Liberty Insurance Holdings, Inc., Other Affiliate Liberty Mutual Agency Corporation., Other Affiliate Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Other Affiliate Liberty Mutual Insurance Company for The First Liberty Insurance Corporation (Lavisky, Matthew)
November 13, 2021 Filing 6 RESPONSE in Opposition re #5 Plaintiff's MOTION to Remand filed by The First Liberty Insurance Corporation. Replies due by 11/22/2021. (Lavisky, Matthew)
November 12, 2021 Filing 5 Plaintiff's MOTION to Remand by Esperanza Vega. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1)(Tyler, Jeremy)
November 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER REQUIRING JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT, CERTIFICATES OF INTERESTED PARTIES AND CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS. Joint Scheduling Report due by 12/3/2021 Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 11/10/2021. See attached document for full details. (drz)
October 18, 2021 Filing 3 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Incorrect case opening information. The Filer selected the incorrect Cause of Action when filing. The correction was made. It is not necessary to re-file this document. (drz)
October 15, 2021 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodney Smith. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (drz)
October 15, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT ) Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15096651, filed by The First Liberty Insurance Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Docket Sheet Docket Sheet)(Lavisky, Matthew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vega v. The First Liberty Insurance Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Esperanza Vega
Represented By: Jonathan Bret Aversano
Represented By: Andrew Fuxa
Represented By: Jeremy Fenton Tyler
Represented By: Wayne Wyndham Geyer, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The First Liberty Insurance Corporation
Represented By: Matthew John Lavisky
Represented By: Latasha Chanell Scott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?