Bernsley v. The Advance Group et al
Martin Bernsley |
The Advance Group, Molloy Bros. Trucking Inc. doing business as Molloy Brothers Moving & Storage and John Doe #6 through John Doe #10 |
0:2021cv62312 |
November 10, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Rodolfo A Ruiz |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #11 Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. Defendants shall file an answer to #1 Complaint on or before February 9, 2022. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 1/7/2022. (rm02) |
Filing 11 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint, #6 Summons Returned Executed, #7 Summons Returned Executed by Molloy Bros. Trucking Inc., The Advance Group. (Blitch, Bridgette) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Bridgette Mannino Blitch on behalf of Molloy Bros. Trucking Inc., The Advance Group. Attorney Bridgette Mannino Blitch added to party Molloy Bros. Trucking Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Bridgette Mannino Blitch added to party The Advance Group(pty:dft). (Blitch, Bridgette) |
Filing 9 ORDER REQUIRING JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT AND CERTIFICATES OF INTERESTED PARTIES. Joint Scheduling Report due by 1/26/2022 Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 1/5/2022. See attached document for full details. (ebz) |
Filing 8 FIRST Clerk's Notice of Undeliverable Mail re #4 Order,. US Mail returned for: Martin Bernsley. The Court has not located an updated address for this party. After two undeliverable notices from the Court, notices will no longer be sent to this party in this case until a correct address is provided. (pgz) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 The Advance Group served on 12/20/2021, response/answer due 1/10/2022. (drz) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 Molloy Bros. Trucking Inc. served on 12/20/2021, response/answer due 1/10/2022. (drz) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Molloy Bros. Trucking Inc., The Advance Group. (amb) |
Filing 4 ORDER TO PERFECT SERVICE. Failure to file proof of service or show good cause by February 8, 2022, will result in a dismissal without further notice. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 12/13/2021. See attached document for full details. (scn) |
Filing 3 Clerks Notice of Receipt of Filing Fee received on 11/10/2021 in the amount of $ 402.00, receipt number FLS000014887 (amb) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (drz) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John Doe #6 through John Doe #10, Molloy Bros. Trucking Inc., The Advance Group. Filing fees $ 402.00, filed by Martin Bernsley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)(drz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.