Cohan v. WRI JT Hollywood Hills II, LP
| Howard Cohan |
| WRI JT Hollywood Hills II, LP doing business as Marathon |
| 0:2021cv62438 |
| December 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Raag Singhal |
| Alicia O Valle |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING CASE (Stipulation for Dismissal due 2/26/2022). Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 1/26/2022. See attached document for full details. (pcs)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Settlement by Howard Cohan (Weiss, Jason) |
| Filing 12 Defendant's ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint by WRI JT Hollywood Hills II, LP. (Grant, Siobhan) |
|
Filing 11
PAPERLESS ORDER granting in part and denying in part #10 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant shall file its Response/Answer to the Complaint by January 18, 2022. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 12/23/2021. (jhy)
|
| Set Response/Answer Due Deadline per DE 11 Order: WRI JT Hollywood Hills II, LP response due 1/18/2022. (kpe) |
| Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to respond to Complaint re #1 Complaint by WRI JT Hollywood Hills II, LP. Responses due by 1/5/2022 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Grant, Siobhan) |
| Filing 9 Defendant's Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by WRI JT Hollywood Hills II, LP identifying Corporate Parent Kimco Realty Corporation, Other Affiliate KRCX WRI HOLDINGS, LLC, Other Affiliate WRI JT Hollywood Hills II GP, LLC, Other Affiliate Kimstone Holdings II, LLC, Other Affiliate KRC JT Holdings, LLC for WRI JT Hollywood Hills II, LP (Grant, Siobhan) |
| Filing 8 Plaintiff's Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by Howard Cohan (Weiss, Jason) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER SETTING TRIAL AND PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULE, REQUIRING MEDIATION, AND REFERRING CERTAIN MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE: (Jury Trial set for 9/26/2022 09:00 AM in Fort Lauderdale Division before Judge Raag Singhal., Calendar Call set for 9/23/2022 10:00 AM in Fort Lauderdale Division before Judge Raag Singhal., Telephonic Status Conference set for 2/10/2022 04:00 PM before Judge Raag Singhal., Amended Pleadings due by 2/7/2022., Discovery due by 6/2/2022., Expert Discovery due by 6/2/2022., Joinder of Parties due by 2/7/2022., Mediation Deadline 6/9/2022., In Limine Motions due by 6/17/2022., Dispositive Motions due by 6/17/2022., Motions due by 6/17/2022., Pretrial Stipulation due by 9/13/2022.), ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle for Discovery Matters. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 12/9/2021. See attached document for full details. (pcs) #Pattern Jury Instruction Builder - To access the latest, up to date changes to the 11th Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions go to https://pji.ca11.uscourts.gov or click here.
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Siobhan Earlyn Penningt Grant on behalf of WRI JT Hollywood Hills II, LP. Attorney Siobhan Earlyn Penningt Grant added to party WRI JT Hollywood Hills II, LP(pty:dft). (Grant, Siobhan) |
|
Filing 5
PAPERLESS ORDER TO FILE CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONSWithin SEVEN (7) DAYS of entry of an appearance, each party, including governmental parties, must file certificates of interested parties and corporate disclosure statements that contain a complete list of persons, associated persons, firms, partnerships, or corporations that have a financial interest in the outcome of this case, including subsidiaries, conglomerates, affiliates, parent corporations, and other identifiable legal entities related to a party. The parties shall not include Judge Singhal or the paired magistrate judges as interested parties unless they have an interest in the litigation. Throughout the pendency of the action, the parties are under a continuing obligation to amend, correct, and update the certificates. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 12/6/2021. (jhy)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICEUnless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion, legal memorandum, brief, and otherwise shall: be double-spaced, in justified alignment, in 12-point font, using either Times New Roman or Arial typeface. This Notice does not supplant the requirements and provisions of Local Rule 7.1(c). The Court cautions parties against excessive use of footnotes.Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions.Parties are encouraged to seek extensions of time in a timely fashion. "A motion for extension of time is not self-executing; no motion is, unless expressly provided for by the applicable rule. Yet, by filing these motions on or near the last day, and then sitting idle pending the Court's disposition of the motion, parties essentially grant their own motion. The Court will not condone this." Compere v. Nusret Miami, LLC, 2020 WL 2844888, at *2 (S.D. Fla. May 7, 2020) (internal citations omitted).Local Rule 16.4, Local Rules for the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, requires that a Notice of Settlement "shall be filed and served jointly by counsel for all parties to the settlement." A unilateral notice of settlement will not stay pre-trial deadlines or hearings.Failure to comply with any of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 12/6/2021. (jhy) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to WRI JT Hollywood Hills II, LP. (jao) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Raag Singhal. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jao) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against WRI JT Hollywood Hills II, LP. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15216115, filed by Howard Cohan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Weiss, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cohan v. WRI JT Hollywood Hills II, LP | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Howard Cohan | |
| Represented By: | Jason Stuart Weiss |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: WRI JT Hollywood Hills II, LP doing business as Marathon | |
| Represented By: | Siobhan Earlyn Penningt Grant |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
