Carter et al v. Smith
Plaintiff: Sheneka Carter, Shadonna Daniels-Aktog and Chasity Daniels
Defendant: Lula Mae Smith
Case Number: 0:2021cv62520
Filed: December 17, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Cecilia M Altonaga
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: False Claims Act
Cause of Action: 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 30, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE of Inheritance Hijacking/Embezzlement Inheritance Theft by Sheneka Carter, Chasity Daniels, and Shadonna Daniels-Aktog (jbs)
December 30, 2021 Filing 5 Notice and Consent to Jurisdiction US Magistrate Judge NOT SIGNED by all parties. Filed by Sheneka Carter, Chasity Daniels, and Shadonna Daniels-Aktog (jbs)
December 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER DISMISSING and Closing Case. Denying as moot #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Sheneka Carter, Shadonna Daniels-Aktog, Chasity Daniels. Signed by Chief Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga on 12/20/2021. See attached document for full details. (ps1)
December 17, 2021 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Sheneka Carter, Chasity Daniels, and Shadonna Daniels-Aktog. (jbs)
December 17, 2021 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Chief Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jbs)
December 17, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Lula Mae Smith. Filing fees $ 402.00. IFP Filed, filed by Sheneka Carter, Chasity Daniels, and Shadonna Daniels-Aktog. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)(jbs)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carter et al v. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sheneka Carter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shadonna Daniels-Aktog
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chasity Daniels
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lula Mae Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?