Lopez v. Northstar Location Services LLC
Michael Lopez |
Northstar Location Services LLC |
0:2021cv62576 |
December 28, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Rodney Smith |
Consumer Credit |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER STAYING CASE. Administratively Closing Case. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 2/23/2022. See attached document for full details. (ls) |
Filing 8 Joint RESPONSE to #7 Order to Show Cause, by Northstar Location Services LLC. (Leon, Jose) |
Filing 7 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE why this case should not be stayed pending the Eleventh Circuit's decision after its en banc rehearing in Hunstein. Show Cause Response due by 1/31/2022. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 1/25/2022. See attached document for full details. (ls) |
Filing 6 RESPONSE in Opposition re #4 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Northstar Location Services LLC. Replies due by 1/27/2022. (Leon, Jose) |
Filing 5 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Northstar Location Services LLC, filed by Michael Lopez. (Attachments: #1 A)(Patti, Thomas) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Michael Lopez. (Patti, Thomas) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss the State Court Complaint contained within the Notice of Removal #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), by Northstar Location Services LLC. Responses due by 1/18/2022 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Leon, Jose) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodney Smith. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (amb) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Complaint) Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15277893, filed by Northstar Location Services LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Summon(s), #3 Civil Cover Sheet State, #4 Docket Sheet State, #5 Civil Cover Sheet Federal)(Leon, Jose) (No Answer/ Motion to Dismiss filed) Text Modified on 12/28/2021 (amb). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Lopez v. Northstar Location Services LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Michael Lopez | |
Represented By: | Jibrael Jarallah Said Hindi |
Represented By: | Thomas John Patti, III |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Northstar Location Services LLC | |
Represented By: | Jose Ignacio Leon |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.