Taeb et al v. NCM Group LLC et al
| David Taeb and Ziauddin Taeb |
| Ilan Doron, NCM Group LLC and NCM Wireless |
| 0:2021mc60993 |
| May 11, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Raag Singhal |
| Contract: Recovery/Enforcement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jordan Alexander Shaw on behalf of Ilan Doron, NCM Group LLC. Attorney Jordan Alexander Shaw added to party Ilan Doron(pty:dft), Attorney Jordan Alexander Shaw added to party NCM Group LLC(pty:dft). (Shaw, Jordan) |
Filing 5
ORDER Directing Clerk To Register Foreign Judgment And Closing Case. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 5/26/2021. See attached document for full details. (kpe)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE by David Taeb Civil Cover Sheet (Mauro, Carl) |
| Filing 3 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. No Civil Cover Sheet. Filer is instructed to file a Notice (Other) with the Civil Cover Sheet attached within 24 hours of the notice. (kpe) |
| Civil Case Terminated. Closing Case. (kpe) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Raag Singhal. (kpe) |
| Filing 1 REGISTRATION of Foreign Judgment . Filing fee $49.00 receipt number AFLSDC-14679145, filed by David Taeb.(Mauro, Carl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
