Rapaport v. Unifin, Inc.
Plaintiff: Meir Rapaport
Defendant: Unifin, Inc.
Case Number: 0:2022cv60134
Filed: January 18, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Roy K Altman
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #7 the Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings. The Court hereby ORDERS and ADJUDGES that this case is STAYED and administratively CLOSED pending the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals's en banc rehearing of Hunstein v. Preferred Collection and Mgmt. Servs., Inc., 17 F.4th 1016 (11th Cir. 2021), opinion vacated, 17 F.4th 1103. Once the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals resolves Hunstein, either party may move to reopen the case. Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 1/26/2022. (kmz)
January 25, 2022 Filing 7 Joint MOTION to Stay Proceedings by Unifin, Inc.. Responses due by 2/8/2022 (Wydro, Ashley)
January 25, 2022 Filing 6 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by Unifin, Inc. (Wydro, Ashley)
January 25, 2022 Filing 5 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint re the Notice of Removal by Unifin, Inc.. (Wydro, Ashley)
January 25, 2022 Filing 4 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by Meir Rapaport (Patti, Thomas)
January 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER Requiring Removal Status Report and Joint Scheduling Report. By January 31, 2022, counsel for the removing party is directed to file and serve a Removal Status Report. Joint Scheduling Report due by 2/7/2022 Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 1/24/2022. See attached document for full details. (pes)
January 18, 2022 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Roy K. Altman. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Patrick M. Hunt is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (bb)
January 18, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Complaint) Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15325430, filed by Unifin, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 State Court Complaint, #3 Docket Sheet, #4 Exhibit A - State Court Documents)(Wydro, Ashley)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rapaport v. Unifin, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Meir Rapaport
Represented By: Jibrael Jarallah Said Hindi
Represented By: Thomas John Patti, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unifin, Inc.
Represented By: Ashley Wydro
Represented By: Dayle Marie Van Hoose
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?