Trufant v. Credit Control Services, Inc.
Adriana Trufant |
Credit Control Services, Inc. doing business as Credit Collection Services |
0:2022cv60150 |
January 20, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Darrin P Gayles |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 PAPERLESS ORDER granting Defendant's #11 Unopposed Motion to Join Consolidated Cases. Because both cases involve nearly the same questions of law and fact, the Court finds good cause to consolidate the above-styled cases in order to avoid unnecessary duplication of judicial labor and effort. Case No. 22-cv-60150-GAYLES shall be CONSOLIDATED into Case No. 21-cv-23149-GAYLES/TORRES. All future filings in this case shall be made under Case No. 21-cv-23149-GAYLES/TORRES only. This case is CLOSED for administrative purposes.Additionally, the Telephonic Status Conference before Judge Darrin P. Gayles at 10:00 A.M. on February 2, 2022 is CANCELLED. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles on 2/1/2022. (jsi) |
Filing 11 Unopposed MOTION to Consolidate Cases by Credit Control Services, Inc.. Responses due by 2/15/2022 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Wonder, Chantel) |
Cases associated with Case No. 21-cv-23149-GAYLES/TORRES. (jsi) |
Filing 10 Defendant's MOTION to Strike #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), Paragraphs 16 through 20 contained in Plaintiff's "ALLEGATIONS" along with the Entirety of "COUNT 2" by Credit Control Services, Inc.. Responses due by 2/10/2022 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Wonder, Chantel) |
Filing 9 NOTICE by Credit Control Services, Inc. re #8 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) Defendant Credit Control Services, Inc.'s Notice of Constitutional Challenge (Wonder, Chantel) |
Filing 8 Defendant's ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint re the Notice of Removal by Credit Control Services, Inc.. (Wonder, Chantel) |
Filing 7 PAPERLESS ORDER setting Telephonic Status Conference before Judge Darrin P. Gayles at 10:00 A.M. on February 2, 2022. Counsel shall enter their appearances telephonically using the following dial-in information: Dial-in Number 888-273-3658; Access Code 7032614; Security Code 5170. Please dial in at least ten minutes before the Telephonic Status Conference begins and wait until your case is called. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles on 1/25/2022. (jsi) |
Filing 6 Notice of Pending, Refiled, Related or Similar Actions by Credit Control Services, Inc. (Wonder, Chantel) |
Filing 5 Defendant's Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by Credit Control Services, Inc. (Wonder, Chantel) |
Filing 4 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by Adriana Trufant (Patti, Thomas) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE. Unless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion shall be double-spaced in Times New Roman 12-point typeface. Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions. Failure to comply with ANY of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including but not limited to, the striking of the motion or dismissal of this action. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles on 1/24/2022. (jsi) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Darrin P. Gayles. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (mab) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Complaint) Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15332727, filed by CREDIT CONTROL SERVICES, INC. d/b/a CREDIT COLLECTION SERVICES. No Answer Filed/ No motion to Dismiss Filed in State Court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Complaint, #2 Docket Sheet, #3 Exhibit Additional State Court Documents, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Wonder, Chantel) Text Modified on 1/20/2022 (mab). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Trufant v. Credit Control Services, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Adriana Trufant | |
Represented By: | Jibrael Jarallah Said Hindi |
Represented By: | Thomas John Patti, III |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Credit Control Services, Inc. doing business as Credit Collection Services | |
Represented By: | Chantel Christine Wonder |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.