WGI, INC. v. CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE
| WGI, INC. |
| CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE |
| 0:2022cv60292 |
| February 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Darrin P Gayles |
| Jared M Strauss |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1446 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 23
PAPERLESS ORDER administratively closing case in light of #21 the parties' Notice of Settlement, which indicates that this matter has settled in full. The parties are hereby notified that, within sixty (60) days of the date of this Order, they must file a Stipulation or Notice of Dismissal and/or Settlement Agreement along with any other pertinent document necessary to conclude this action. Any pending motions are denied as moot. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (hs01)
|
|
Filing 22
PAPERLESS Order Cancelling 3/31/2022 Hearing on Amended Motion for Preliminary Injunction in light of #21 Notice of Settlement. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss on 3/17/2022. (emd)
|
| Filing 21 NOTICE of Settlement by WGI, INC. (Lombard, Eduardo) |
|
Filing 20
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #19 Motion for Extension of Time. The evidentiary hearing on DE #9 Amended Motion for Preliminary Injunction is hereby continued to 3/31/2022 at 9:30 AM in Fort Lauderdale Division before Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss. The parties' Rule 26(f) joint report shall be filed by 3/17/2022. Plaintiff shall file its reply to DE #13 by 3/21/2022. The parties' Joint Notice of Filing shall be filed by 3/25/2022.Additionally, by 3/16/2022, the parties shall file a joint notice of settlement, joint stipulation of dismissal, or joint notice indicating that the parties intend to proceed with the evidentiary hearing on DE #9 Amended Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss on 3/7/2022. (emd)
|
| Filing 19 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to Reset Deadlines and Evidentiary Hearing on WGI's Motion for Preliminary Injunction re 16 Order on Motion for Extension of Time, #13 Response in Opposition to Motion, by WGI, INC.. Responses due by 3/21/2022 (Lombard, Eduardo) |
|
Filing 18
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #17 Motion for Extension of Time. Reply to DE #13 due by 3/9/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss on 3/3/2022. (emd)
|
| Filing 17 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File its Reply Memorandum re #13 Response in Opposition to Motion, by WGI, INC.. Responses due by 3/17/2022 (Lombard, Eduardo) |
|
Filing 16
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #15 Motion for Extension of Time. Joint Notice of Filing due by 3/10/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss on 3/2/2022. (emd)
|
| Filing 15 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to Extend the Joint Notice of Filing Deadline re #14 Order Setting Hearing on Motion,, Set/Reset Deadlines, by WGI, INC.. Responses due by 3/16/2022 (Lombard, Eduardo) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER Setting Evidentiary Hearing on Motion #9 Amended MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction, Supporting Memorandum of Law, and Request for Expedited Consideration: Evidentiary Hearing set for 3/14/2022 at 9:30 AM in Fort Lauderdale Division before Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss. Joint Notice of Filing due by 3/7/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss on 2/25/2022. See attached document for full details. (emd)
|
| Filing 13 RESPONSE in Opposition re #9 Amended MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction, Supporting Memorandum of Law, and Request for Expedited Consideration filed by CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE. Replies due by 3/4/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F)(Dion, Edward) |
| Filing 12 Defendant's ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint re the Notice of Removal and Amended Complaint by CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE. (Dion, Edward) |
|
Filing 11
PAPERLESS ORDER re #9 Amended MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction, Supporting Memorandum of Law, and Request for Expedited Consideration filed by WGI, INC. Defendant shall file a response to the motion by Noon on 2/25/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss on 2/18/2022. (emd)
|
|
Filing 10
PAPERLESS ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and a report and recommendation on all dispositive matters. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (hs01)
|
| Filing 9 Amended MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction, Supporting Memorandum of Law, and Request for Expedited Consideration by WGI, INC.. Responses due by 3/3/2022 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit Exhibit H)(Lombard, Eduardo) |
|
Filing 8
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant shall respond to the Complaint on or before February 21, 2022. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (hs01)
|
| Filing 7 Defendant's MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer to Amended Complaint by CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Motion for Enlargement of Time to File Answer to Amended Complaint)(Dion, Edward) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Change of Address, Email or Law Firm Name by Eduardo S. Lombard (Lombard, Eduardo) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE. Unless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion shall be double-spaced in Times New Roman 12-point typeface. Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions. Failure to comply with ANY of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including but not limited to, the striking of the motion or dismissal of this action. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (hs01) |
| Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE - Attorney Admissions has not updated address and/or email information for attorney Valerie Vicente re #3 Notice of Change of Address, Email or Law Firm Name. Attorney has not followed the required procedures for updating their information with the Court. Attorney is instructed to go to their PACER account, Manage My Account, to complete the process of updating their information. The Court is not responsible for updating secondary email addresses. See the Court's website for detailed instructions. #www.flsd.uscourts.gov/updating-your-information (cw) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Change of Address, Email or Law Firm Name by Valerie Vicente (Vicente, Valerie) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Darrin P. Gayles. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (ebz) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - WGI, INC. v. CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA) Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15379735, filed by CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE, A Florida Municipality,. No Motion to Dismiss and/or Answer has been attached. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B)(Dion, Edward) (ebz). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
