Ma et al v. National Specialty Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Huijun Ma and Huayan Xu
Defendant: National Specialty Insurance Company
Case Number: 0:2022cv60319
Filed: February 10, 2022
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Rodney Smith
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 15, 2022 Filing 5 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 16.1 by National Specialty Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Scheduling Order)(Waite, Victor)
March 7, 2022 Filing 4 Defendant's Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by National Specialty Insurance Company identifying Other Affiliate Markel Corporation for National Specialty Insurance Company (Waite, Victor)
March 7, 2022 Filing 3 STATUS REPORT by National Specialty Insurance Company (Waite, Victor)
February 10, 2022 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodney Smith. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (cds)
February 10, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Complaint for Damages) Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15390471, filed by National Specialty Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Complaint, #3 Exhibit Affidavit of Corp. Rep., #4 Exhibit Cty Prop. Appraiser Records, #5 Exhibit Index of Records, #6 Exhibit Notice to Circuit Court of Removal)(Waite, Victor) Modified Text on 2/10/2022 (cds). Answer Filed(Exh.#5)/No Motion to Dismiss Filed.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ma et al v. National Specialty Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Huijun Ma
Represented By: Kristen Diane Montgomery
Represented By: Michael Abraham Citron
Represented By: Nicole Elizabeth Garcia
Represented By: Regine Soraya Lauren Etienne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Huayan Xu
Represented By: Kristen Diane Montgomery
Represented By: Michael Abraham Citron
Represented By: Nicole Elizabeth Garcia
Represented By: Regine Soraya Lauren Etienne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: National Specialty Insurance Company
Represented By: Brian Patrick Henry
Represented By: Victor H Waite
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?