Martz v. Amen Clinics, Inc.
| Lisa Martz |
| Amen Clinics, Inc. |
| 0:2022cv60531 |
| March 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Rodolfo A Ruiz |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
ORDER CONFIRMING ARBITRATION APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT : ORDER Dismissing Case (With Prejudice) Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 10/27/2022. See attached document for full details. (nan)
|
| SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 17 [misc] restricted/sealed until further notice. (1135633) |
|
Filing 16
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #15 Motion to File Under Seal. The parties are hereby authorized to file their General EEOC Settlement Agreement and Release ("Agreement") under seal, and the parties shall file the Agreement on or before October 28, 2022. The Court will dispose of the Agreement after it has had the opportunity to review it and this action is properly dismissed. The Clerk is directed to restrict public access to the aforementioned filing. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 10/24/2022. (zse)
|
| Filing 15 Unopposed MOTION to Seal Motion to File General EEOC Settlement Agreement and Release Under Seal per Local Rule 5.4 by Amen Clinics, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Sarangoulis, Roman) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE by Amen Clinics, Inc. re 13 Order Lifting Stay,,,,,, of Filing Settlement Agreement and Release of FLSA Claims (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Sarangoulis, Roman) |
|
Filing 13
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #12 Motion to Lift Stay and deferring ruling on Motion to Confirm. Following settlements reached during the arbitration of Plaintiff's claims, the parties have moved for confirmation of the arbitration order approving the FLSA settlement. The parties request the Court allow them to "email to chambers" their EEOC settlement agreement in the event the Court finds it appropriate to review both settlement agreements to ensure the fairness of the parties' FLSA settlement. [ECF No. 12] at 4 n.1. Given the Court's obligation to scrutinize a settlement of FLSA claims to determine that it is a "fair and reasonable resolution of a bona fide dispute over FLSA provisions," the Court finds it appropriate to review the settlement agreements to determine if the arbitration order should be confirmed. See Lynns Food Stores, Inc. v. United States, 679 F.2d 1350, 1355 (11th Cir. 1982). Therefore, the stay entered on March 21, 2022 [ECF No. 8] is LIFTED and this case is hereby REOPENED. The Clerk of Court shall restore this case to the active litigation docket. On or before October 24, 2022, the parties shall file their FLSA settlement agreement on the public docket. Additionally, on or before October 24, 2022, the parties shall file an appropriate motion requesting to file their EEOC settlement agreement under seal. The Court will not allow submission of this agreement solely by email. The Court will defer ruling on the parties' Motion to Confirm the Arbitrator's Approval of the FLSA Settlement Agreement pending the Court's review of the agreement. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 10/19/2022. (zse)
|
| Filing 12 Joint MOTION to Lift Stay and Petition to Confirm the Arbitrator's Approval of the FLSA Settlement Agreement re #8 Order on Motion to Stay, by Amen Clinics, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Sarangoulis, Roman) |
| Filing 11 STATUS REPORT Regarding Arbitration (Joint) by Amen Clinics, Inc. (Sarangoulis, Roman) |
| Filing 10 STATUS REPORT regarding Arbitration (Joint) by Amen Clinics, Inc. (Sarangoulis, Roman) |
| Filing 9 STATUS REPORT regarding Arbitration (Joint) by Amen Clinics, Inc. (Sarangoulis, Roman) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Motion to Stay. Closing Case. Motions Terminated: #7 Unopposed MOTION to Stay Pending Arbitration filed by Amen Clinics, Inc.. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 3/21/2022. See attached document for full details. (rm02)
|
| Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION to Stay Pending Arbitration by Amen Clinics, Inc.. Responses due by 4/4/2022 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Sarangoulis, Roman) |
|
Filing 6
PAPERLESS ORDER regarding Settlement Conference Referral. The District Court has entered an Order (DE #3 ) referring the case to me for a settlement conference. Accordingly, counsel for the parties are ORDERED to meet and confer to determine possible dates on which to conduct the settlement conference. Prior to the date indicated in the District Court's Order, Plaintiff's counsel shall email my chambers at strauss@flsd.uscourts.gov and copy opposing counsel with no fewer than three dates on which the parties and their counsel are available for the settlement conference. Following the submission of proposed dates, I will enter an order setting the settlement conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss on 3/15/2022. (ab03)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER REQUIRING REMOVAL STATUS REPORT -(Status Report due by 3/28/2022.) Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 3/14/2022. See attached document for full details. (ail)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER REQUIRING JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT AND CERTIFICATES OF INTERESTED PARTIES (Joint Scheduling Report, Certificates of Interested Parties and Corporate Disclosure Statements due by 4/4/2022) Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 3/14/2022. See attached document for full details. (ail)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER IN ACTIONS BROUGHT UNDER THE FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 3/14/2022. See attached document for full details. (ail)
|
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (ail) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Complaint) Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15470623, filed by Amen Clinics, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sarangoulis, Roman) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Martz v. Amen Clinics, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Lisa Martz | |
| Represented By: | Alexandra Christine Hayes |
| Represented By: | Jorge Freddy Perera |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Amen Clinics, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Roman Alan Sarangoulis |
| Represented By: | Mendy Halberstam |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
