Caplan v. TERE AUTO SERVICES INC. et al
Plaintiff: Howard Michael Caplan
Defendant: TERE AUTO SERVICES INC. a Florida Profit Corporation doing business as PEERLESS AUTO BODY and PEERLESS HOLDINGS INC.
Case Number: 0:2022cv60651
Filed: March 31, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Beth Bloom
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Accommodations
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 9, 2022 Filing 15 FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of Howard Michael Caplan against Peerless Holdings, Inc., Tere Auto Services, Inc.; Closing Case. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 5/6/2022. See attached document for full details. (ls)
May 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER granting #13 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 5/6/2022. See attached document for full details. (ls)
May 6, 2022 Filing 13 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings by PEERLESS HOLDINGS INC., TERE AUTO SERVICES INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Ershock, Alex)
May 6, 2022 Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint by PEERLESS HOLDINGS INC., TERE AUTO SERVICES INC.. (Ershock, Alex)
May 3, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Alex Brandon Claude Ershock on behalf of PEERLESS HOLDINGS INC., TERE AUTO SERVICES INC.. Attorney Alex Brandon Claude Ershock added to party PEERLESS HOLDINGS INC.(pty:dft), Attorney Alex Brandon Claude Ershock added to party TERE AUTO SERVICES INC.(pty:dft). (Ershock, Alex)
May 3, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Daniel R. Levine on behalf of PEERLESS HOLDINGS INC., TERE AUTO SERVICES INC.. Attorney Daniel R. Levine added to party PEERLESS HOLDINGS INC.(pty:dft), Attorney Daniel R. Levine added to party TERE AUTO SERVICES INC.(pty:dft). (Levine, Daniel)
April 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER ON DEFAULT PROCEDURES re #7 Summons Returned Executed, filed by Howard Michael Caplan. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 4/30/2022. See attached document for full details. (drz)
April 18, 2022 Filing 8 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Howard Michael Caplan. PEERLESS HOLDINGS INC. served on 4/15/2022, response/answer due 5/6/2022. (Stern, Ronald)
April 11, 2022 Filing 7 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Howard Michael Caplan. TERE AUTO SERVICES INC. served on 4/8/2011, response/answer due 4/29/2011. (Stern, Ronald)
April 5, 2022 Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Counsel re #5 Order by Ronald E. Stern on behalf of Howard Michael Caplan (Stern, Ronald)
April 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER REQUIRING VERIFIED CERTIFICATE OF COUNSEL, SCHEDULING REPORT, AND CERTIFICATES OF INTERESTED PARTIES Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 3/31/2022. See attached document for full details. (ail)
March 31, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Ronnette Gleizer on behalf of Howard Michael Caplan. Attorney Ronnette Gleizer added to party Howard Michael Caplan(pty:pla). (Gleizer, Ronnette)
March 31, 2022 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to PEERLESS HOLDINGS INC., TERE AUTO SERVICES INC.. (Attachments: #1 Summon(s))(ail)
March 31, 2022 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Beth Bloom. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (ail)
March 31, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15520947, filed by Howard Michael Caplan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Summon(s))(Stern, Ronald)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Caplan v. TERE AUTO SERVICES INC. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Howard Michael Caplan
Represented By: Ronnette Gleizer
Represented By: Ronald E. Stern
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TERE AUTO SERVICES INC. a Florida Profit Corporation doing business as PEERLESS AUTO BODY
Represented By: Alex Brandon Claude Ershock
Represented By: Daniel R. Levine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PEERLESS HOLDINGS INC.
Represented By: Alex Brandon Claude Ershock
Represented By: Daniel R. Levine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?