Caplan v. Lord Auto, LLC et al
| Howard Michael Caplan |
| LORD AUTO LLC a Florida Limited Liability Company doing business as ALLOY WHEEL REPAIR SPECIALISTS, PARK 31ST CORP. and Lord Auto, LLC doing business as ALLOY WHEEL REPAIR SPECIALISTS |
| 0:2022cv60679 |
| April 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Rodolfo A Ruiz |
| Civil Rights: Accommodations |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
PAPERLESS ORDER Setting Telephonic Status Conference. A telephonic status conference is hereby set in this matter for Tuesday, June 7, 2022 at 10:30 A.M. The parties are instructed to call 1-877-402-9753 by no than 10:25 A.M. The access code is 9372453 and the password is 0918. The Court requires that the parties appear via a landline (i.e., not a cellular phone or a speaker phone) if possible, for clarity. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 6/2/2022. (jb03)
|
| Filing 16 STATUS REPORT by PARK 31ST CORP. (Kravitz, Ian) |
| Filing 15 STATUS REPORT of Non-Settlement by Howard Michael Caplan (Gleizer, Ronnette) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER OF DISMISSAL AS TO DEFENDANT LORD AUTO LLC (Without Prejudice) Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 5/10/2022. See attached document for full details. (cqs)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal of Defendant, Lord Auto LLC by Howard Michael Caplan (Stern, Ronald) |
|
Filing 12
PAPERLESS ORDER Administratively Closing Case Given Ongoing Settlement Negotiations. As discussed during the May 10, 2022 telephonic status conference, the parties are working diligently to resolve this case without the need for protracted litigation and are on the verge of achieving a settlement. The Court finds that the favorable prospect of settlement warrants the administrative closure of this case in order to provide the parties sufficient time to finalize negotiations. Therefore, this case is ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED and the parties are instructed to file the requisite settlement documents (or a joint status report updating the Court on the matter if a settlement has not yet been reached) on or before June 1, 2022. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 5/10/2022. (jb)
|
| Filing 11 PAPERLESS Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II: Telephonic Status Conference held on 5/10/2022. Order to follow. Attorney Appearance(s): Ronald E. Stern, Ian Todd Kravitz, Court Reporter: Vernita Allen-Williams, 305-523-5048 / Vernita_Allen-Williams@flsd.uscourts.gov. (gp) |
|
Filing 10
PAPERLESS ORDER Setting Telephonic Status Conference. A telephonic status conference is hereby set in this matter for Tuesday May 10, 2022 at 11:00 A.M. The parties are instructed to call 1-877-402-9753 by no later than 10:55 A.M. The access code is 9372453 and the password is 0918. The Court requires that the parties appear via a landline (i.e., not a cellular phone or a speaker phone) if possible, for clarity. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 5/3/2022. (jb03)
|
|
Filing 9
PAPERLESS ORDER Granting Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time, ECF No. #8 . Defendants shall respond to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before May 19, 2022. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 5/3/2022. (jb)
|
| Reset Deadlines LORD AUTO LLC answer due 5/19/2022; PARK 31ST CORP. answer due 5/19/2022 Per DE#9. (cqs) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint re #1 Complaint, by LORD AUTO LLC, PARK 31ST CORP.. Responses due by 5/16/2022 (Kravitz, Ian) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Ian Todd Kravitz on behalf of LORD AUTO LLC, PARK 31ST CORP.. Attorney Ian Todd Kravitz added to party LORD AUTO LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Ian Todd Kravitz added to party PARK 31ST CORP.(pty:dft). (Kravitz, Ian) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Howard Michael Caplan. PARK 31ST CORP. served on 4/8/2022, response/answer due 4/29/2022. (Stern, Ronald) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Howard Michael Caplan. LORD AUTO LLC served on 4/7/2022, response/answer due 4/28/2022. (Stern, Ronald) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Ronnette Gleizer on behalf of Howard Michael Caplan. Attorney Ronnette Gleizer added to party Howard Michael Caplan(pty:pla). (Gleizer, Ronnette) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to LORD AUTO LLC, PARK 31ST CORP.. (cds) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (cds) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15536930, filed by Howard Michael Caplan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Summon(s))(Stern, Ronald) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
