Lee v. GEO Secure Services, LLC
| Michele J. Lee |
| GEO Secure Services, LLC |
| 0:2022cv60689 |
| April 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Rodolfo A Ruiz |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
ORDER REQUIRING JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT AND CERTIFICATES OF INTERESTED PARTIES Joint Scheduling Report due by 6/13/2022 Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 5/23/2022. See attached document for full details. (cqs)
|
|
Filing 18
PAPERLESS ORDER Denying as Moot Plaintiff's Motion for Referral to Volunteer Attorney Program, ECF No. #4 ("Motion"). Plaintiff has retained counsel. See ECF No. #8 . Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion is DENIED as MOOT. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 5/23/2022. (jb03)
|
| Filing 17 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #14 Amended Complaint/Amended Notice of Removal with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Michele J. Lee. GEO Secure Services, LLC served on 5/19/2022, response/answer due 6/9/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Buckner, Michael) |
| Filing 16 Summons Issued as to GEO Secure Services, LLC. (cds) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) AND REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF A SUMMONS by Michele J. Lee re #14 Amended Complaint/Amended Notice of Removal filed by Michele J. Lee (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Summons) (Buckner, Michael) |
| Filing 14 AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL against GEO Secure Services, LLC, filed by Michele J. Lee.(Buckner, Michael) |
| Filing 13 Clerks Notice of Receipt of Filing Fee received on 4/27/2022 in the amount of $ 402.00, receipt number FLS249257. (vt) |
| Reset Deadlines Filing Fee due by 4/27/2022. PER DE# 12 (cds) |
|
Filing 12
PAPERLESS ORDER Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time, ECF No. #11 . Plaintiff shall pay the required filing fee on or before April 27, 2022. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 4/26/2022. (jb)
|
| Filing 11 Plaintiff's MOTION for Extension of Time to pay filing fee re #7 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by Michele J. Lee. Responses due by 5/10/2022 (Buckner, Michael) |
| Reset Deadlines/Hearings Amended Complaint due by 5/16/2022. PER DE# 10 (cds) |
|
Filing 10
PAPERLESS ORDER Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File an Amended Complaint, ECF No. #9 ("Motion"). Plaintiff shall file her amended complaint on or before May 16, 2022. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 4/22/2022. (jb03)
|
| Filing 9 Plaintiff's MOTION for Extension of Time to Amend #1 Complaint by Michele J. Lee. Responses due by 5/5/2022 (Buckner, Michael) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Michael Lamar Buckner on behalf of Michele J. Lee. Attorney Michael Lamar Buckner added to party Michele J. Lee(pty:pla). (Buckner, Michael) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER Denying #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff shall pay the Clerk the required filing fee of $402, but may do so in monthly installments of $50.00. Filing Fee due by 4/26/2022. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 4/12/2022. See attached document for full details. (cds)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Compliance (Copy of Order Mailed) re #5 Order (cds) |
| Set Deadlines Amended Complaint due by 4/26/2022. PER DE#5 (cds) |
|
Filing 5
Order to Amend. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 4/12/2022. (jb)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Referral to Volunteer Attorney Program by Michele J. Lee. (ls) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Michele J. Lee. (ls) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (ls) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against GEO Secure Services, LLC. Filing fees $ 402.00. IFP Filed, filed by Michele J. Lee. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ls) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lee v. GEO Secure Services, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michele J. Lee | |
| Represented By: | Michael Lamar Buckner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: GEO Secure Services, LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
