Addarich Diaz v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Taisha Addarich Diaz
Defendant: Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
Case Number: 0:2022cv60721
Filed: April 11, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Rodney Smith
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER OF DISMISSAL (Without Prejudice) Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 4/28/2022. See attached document for full details. (ail)
April 28, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice by Taisha Addarich Diaz (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Palamara, Alexander)
April 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Order Requiring Joint Scheduling Report, Certificates of Interested Parties and Corporate Disclosure Statements. Joint Scheduling Report, Certificates of Interested Parties and Corporate Disclosure Statements due by 6/17/2022. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 4/14/2022. See attached document for full details. (jas)
April 14, 2022 Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Taisha Addarich Diaz. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company waiver sent on 4/12/2022, response/answer due 6/13/2022. (Palamara, Alexander)
April 12, 2022 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company. (jas)
April 11, 2022 Filing 3 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Venue on the Civil Cover Sheet does not match the initiating document. The Clerks Office confirmed Broward (Office - Ft Lauderdale) as the county with the filer. It is not necessary to re-file this document. (jas)
April 11, 2022 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodney Smith. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jas)
April 11, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15549434, filed by Taisha Addarich Diaz. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Exhibit STD Policy, #4 Exhibit LTD Policy)(Palamara, Alexander)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Addarich Diaz v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Taisha Addarich Diaz
Represented By: Gregory Michael Dell
Represented By: Alexander Arthur Palamara
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?