Goldfarb et al v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
| Levi Goldfarb and Benjamin Goldfarb |
| Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company |
| 0:2022cv60804 |
| April 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Federico A Moreno |
| Insurance |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #10 Plaintiff's MOTION for Summary Judgment by Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company. (Suarez, Tanya) |
| Filing 11 Plaintiff's MOTION for Summary Judgment by Benjamin Goldfarb, Levi Goldfarb. Responses due by 7/5/2022 (Metsch, Lawrence) |
| Filing 10 Plaintiff's MOTION for Summary Judgment by Benjamin Goldfarb, Levi Goldfarb. Responses due by 7/5/2022 (Metsch, Lawrence) |
Filing 9
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation. Mediation Deadline 10/19/2022. Signed by Judge Federico A. Moreno on 5/31/2022. See attached document for full details. (mti)
|
|
Filing 8
SCHEDULING ORDER: Jury Trial set for two-week period commencing 12/19/2022 before Judge Federico A. Moreno. Calendar Call set for 12/13/2022 02:00 PM before Judge Federico A. Moreno. Signed by Judge Federico A. Moreno on 5/31/2022. See attached document for full details. (mti) #Pattern Jury Instruction Builder - To access the latest, up to date changes to the 11th Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions go to https://pji.ca11.uscourts.gov or click here.
|
| Filing 7 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint by Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company. (Suarez, Tanya) |
|
Filing 6
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #4 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint. Response due 5/31/2022. Signed by Judge Federico A. Moreno on 5/23/2022. (mti)
|
| Filing 5 Clerks Notice to Filer re #4 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint re #1 Complaint,. Wrong Motion Relief(s) Selected; ERROR - The Filer selected the wrong motion relief(s) when docketing the motion. The correction was made by the Clerk. It is not necessary to refile this document but future motions filed must include applicable reliefs. (ls) |
| Filing 4 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint by Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company. Attorney Tanya Irene Suarez added to party Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company(pty:dft). Responses due by 6/3/2022 (Suarez, Tanya) Modified Relief on 5/20/2022 (ls). |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company. (kpe) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Federico A. Moreno. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (kpe) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15591922, filed by Levi Goldfarb, Benjamin Goldfarb. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Employee Benefit Program, #2 Exhibit Insurance Policy, #3 Exhibit Claim Denial Letter, #4 Exhibit Administrative Appeal, #5 Exhibit Denial Of Administrative Appeal, #6 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #7 Summon(s) Summons)(Metsch, Lawrence) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
