Forsythe v. Starboard Yacht Group LLC et al
Plaintiff: Paul Forsythe
Defendant: Starboard Yacht Group LLC and Jake Stratmann
Case Number: 0:2022cv60854
Filed: May 4, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Raag Singhal
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 0002 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 21, 2022 Filing 16 Plaintiff's MOTION to Strike #6 Answer to Complaint, Affirmative Defenses by Paul Forsythe. Attorney Allyson Morgado added to party Paul Forsythe(pty:pla). Responses due by 7/5/2022 (Morgado, Allyson)
June 21, 2022 Filing 15 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule by Paul Forsythe (Attachments: #1 Joint Proposed Scheduling Order)(Kleppin, Chris)
June 21, 2022 Filing 14 NOTICE of Compliance by Paul Forsythe (Kleppin, Chris)
June 21, 2022 Filing 13 Statement of: Claim by Paul Forsythe (Kleppin, Chris)
June 8, 2022 Filing 12 Plaintiff's Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by Paul Forsythe (Kleppin, Chris)
June 8, 2022 Filing 11 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by Starboard Yacht Group LLC, Jake Stratmann (Rapaport, Marc)
June 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER Requiring Joint Scheduling Report, Statement of Claim and Response, and ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle for Settlement Conference. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 6/1/2022. See attached document for full details. (pes)
June 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 PAPERLESS ORDER TO FILE CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONSWithin SEVEN (7) DAYS of entry of an appearance, each party, including governmental parties, must file certificates of interested parties and corporate disclosure statements that contain a complete list of persons, associated persons, firms, partnerships, or corporations that have a financial interest in the outcome of this case, including subsidiaries, conglomerates, affiliates, parent corporations, and other identifiable legal entities related to a party. The parties shall not include Judge Singhal or the paired magistrate judges as interested parties unless they have an interest in the litigation. Throughout the pendency of the action, the parties are under a continuing obligation to amend, correct, and update the certificates. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 6/1/2022. (eca)
June 1, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICEUnless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion, legal memorandum, brief, and otherwise shall: be double-spaced, in justified alignment, in 12-point font, using either Times New Roman or Arial typeface. This Notice does not supplant the requirements and provisions of Local Rule 7.1(c). The Court cautions parties against excessive use of footnotes.Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions.Parties are encouraged to seek extensions of time in a timely fashion. "A motion for extension of time is not self-executing; no motion is, unless expressly provided for by the applicable rule. Yet, by filing these motions on or near the last day, and then sitting idle pending the Court's disposition of the motion, parties essentially grant their own motion. The Court will not condone this." Compere v. Nusret Miami, LLC, 2020 WL 2844888, at *2 (S.D. Fla. May 7, 2020) (internal citations omitted).Exhibits to pleadings and motions shall be docketed in accordance with the Courts CM/ECF procedures, Rule 3L.(2): (2) Describing an Attachment to a Docket EntryA party filing an attachment to a document shall select one of the prescribed attachment categories from the drop-down menu (e.g., affidavit, transcript), provide an alphabetical or numerical designation (e.g., Exhibit A, Exhibit 1), and descriptively name each attachment (e.g., Exhibit 1 - Affidavit of Boo Radley) in a manner that enables the Court to easily locate and distinguish attachments. (Emphasis added.) Local Rule 16.4, Local Rules for the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, requires that a Notice of Settlement "shall be filed and served jointly by counsel for all parties to the settlement." A unilateral notice of settlement will not stay pre-trial deadlines or hearings.Failure to comply with any of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 6/1/2022. (eca)
May 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II recused. Case reassigned to Judge Raag Singhal and Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle for all further proceedings. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 5/31/2022. See attached document for full details. (bms)
May 31, 2022 Filing 6 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint with Jury Demand by Starboard Yacht Group LLC, Jake Stratmann. Attorney Marc Alexander Rapaport added to party Starboard Yacht Group LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Marc Alexander Rapaport added to party Jake Stratmann(pty:dft). (Rapaport, Marc)
May 10, 2022 Filing 5 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Paul Forsythe. Jake Stratmann served on 5/9/2022, response/answer due 5/31/2022. (Kleppin, Chris)
May 10, 2022 Filing 4 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Paul Forsythe. Starboard Yacht Group LLC served on 5/9/2022, response/answer due 5/31/2022. (Kleppin, Chris)
May 5, 2022 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Starboard Yacht Group LLC, Jake Stratmann. (kpe)
May 4, 2022 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (kpe)
May 4, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Starboard Yacht Group LLC, Jake Stratmann. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15613529, filed by Paul Forsythe. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Summon(s))(Kleppin, Chris)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Forsythe v. Starboard Yacht Group LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Paul Forsythe
Represented By: Chris Kleppin
Represented By: Allyson Morgado
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Starboard Yacht Group LLC
Represented By: Marc Alexander Rapaport
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jake Stratmann
Represented By: Marc Alexander Rapaport
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?