Guasto v. Propel Holdings Inc.
Nicholas Guasto |
Propel Holdings Inc. and Propel Holdings Inc. doing business as CREDITFRESH |
0:2022cv60871 |
May 6, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Raag Singhal |
Alicia O Valle |
Personal Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 20 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), by Propel Holdings Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Goldberg, Martin) |
Filing 19 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jibrael Jarallah Said Hindi on behalf of Nicholas Guasto. Attorney Jibrael Jarallah Said Hindi added to party Nicholas Guasto(pty:pla). (Hindi, Jibrael) |
Filing 18 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jennifer Gomes Simil on behalf of Nicholas Guasto. Attorney Jennifer Gomes Simil added to party Nicholas Guasto(pty:pla). (Simil, Jennifer) |
![]() |
Filing 16 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 26(f) by Nicholas Guasto (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Hiraldo, Manuel) |
![]() |
Filing 14 Unopposed MOTION to Set the Deadline to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint re #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), by Propel Holdings Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Goldberg, Martin) |
Filing 13 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Nicholas Guasto. Propel Holdings Inc. served on 4/14/2022, response/answer due 5/5/2022. (Hiraldo, Manuel) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICEUnless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion, legal memorandum, brief, and otherwise shall: be double-spaced, in justified alignment, in 12-point font, using either Times New Roman or Arial typeface. This Notice does not supplant the requirements and provisions of Local Rule 7.1(c). The Court cautions parties against excessive use of footnotes.Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions.Parties are encouraged to seek extensions of time in a timely fashion. "A motion for extension of time is not self-executing; no motion is, unless expressly provided for by the applicable rule. Yet, by filing these motions on or near the last day, and then sitting idle pending the Court's disposition of the motion, parties essentially grant their own motion. The Court will not condone this." Compere v. Nusret Miami, LLC, 2020 WL 2844888, at *2 (S.D. Fla. May 7, 2020) (internal citations omitted).Exhibits to pleadings and motions shall be docketed in accordance with the Courts CM/ECF procedures, Rule 3L.(2): (2) Describing an Attachment to a Docket EntryA party filing an attachment to a document shall select one of the prescribed attachment categories from the drop-down menu (e.g., affidavit, transcript), provide an alphabetical or numerical designation (e.g., Exhibit A, Exhibit 1), and descriptively name each attachment (e.g., Exhibit 1 - Affidavit of Boo Radley) in a manner that enables the Court to easily locate and distinguish attachments. (Emphasis added.) Local Rule 16.4, Local Rules for the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, requires that a Notice of Settlement "shall be filed and served jointly by counsel for all parties to the settlement." A unilateral notice of settlement will not stay pre-trial deadlines or hearings.Failure to comply with any of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 5/9/2022. (pb00) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Gabriel W. Slater. Filing Fee $ 200.00 Receipt # AFLSDC-15622641 by Propel Holdings Inc.. Responses due by 5/23/2022 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Goldberg, Martin) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Robert C. Collins III. Filing Fee $ 200.00 Receipt # AFLSDC-15622596 by Propel Holdings Inc.. Responses due by 5/23/2022 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Goldberg, Martin) |
Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Propel Holdings Inc. (Goldberg, Martin) |
Filing 4 Bar Letter re: Admissions sent to attorney Robert C. Collins III and Gabriel Slater, mailing date May 9, 2022, (pt) |
Filing 3 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Incorrect case opening information. The Filer selected the incorrect Cause of Action when filing. The correction was made. It is not necessary to re-file this document. (nan) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Raag Singhal. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (nan) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Class Action Complaint) Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15620406, filed by Propel Holdings Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1 - State Court Complaint & State Court Summons #3 Exhibit 2 - Other State Court Documents, No Answer/Motion to Dismiss filed.)(Goldberg, Martin) Modified Attachment Descriptions on 5/9/2022 (nan). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.