SCLAFANI v. CITY OF MARGATE
| ANTHONY SCLAFANI |
| CITY OF MARGATE |
| 0:2022cv61126 |
| June 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Rodney Smith |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 0621 Job Discrimination (Age) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
Plaintiff's MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint by ANTHONY SCLAFANI. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Amended Complaint)(Levy, Michelle)
|
|
Filing 9
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion. Responses due by 8/5/2022 Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 7/26/2022. (agy)
|
|
Filing 8
Plaintiff's MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #7 Defendant's MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Complaint FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by ANTHONY SCLAFANI. (Levy, Michelle)
|
|
Filing 7
Defendant's MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Complaint FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by CITY OF MARGATE. Responses due by 7/26/2022 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 (Charge of Discrimination))(Railey, Jonathan)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jonathan Howard Railey on behalf of CITY OF MARGATE. Attorney Jonathan Howard Railey added to party CITY OF MARGATE(pty:dft). (Railey, Jonathan)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Christopher J. Stearns, Jr on behalf of CITY OF MARGATE. Attorney Christopher J. Stearns, Jr added to party CITY OF MARGATE(pty:dft). (Stearns, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 4
SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by ANTHONY SCLAFANI. CITY OF MARGATE served on 6/21/2022, response/answer due 7/12/2022. (Levy, Michelle)
|
|
Filing 3
Summons Issued as to CITY OF MARGATE. (mab)
|
|
Filing 2
Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodney Smith. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (mab)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against CITY OF MARGATE. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15716047, filed by ANTHONY SCLAFANI. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summon(s))(Levy, Michelle)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: SCLAFANI v. CITY OF MARGATE | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: ANTHONY SCLAFANI | |
| Represented By: | Michelle C. Levy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CITY OF MARGATE | |
| Represented By: | Christopher J. Stearns, Jr. |
| Represented By: | Jonathan Howard Railey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
