Rodina Foodstore Inc. v. Elatnikov et al
Plaintiff: RODINA FOODSTORE INC. and Rodina Foodstore, Inc.
Defendant: ANDREI ELATNIKOV, NADEJDA ELATNIKOVA, YouTube LLC and Google LLC
Case Number: 0:2022cv61591
Filed: August 26, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Lisette M Reid
Referring Judge: Raag Singhal
2 Judge: Rodney Smith
Nature of Suit: Assault Libel & Slander
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER Dismissing Case as to Party(ies) Google LLC (Delaware company) and YouTube LLC (Delaware company) - case remains open. (With Prejudice) Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 10/12/2022. See attached document for full details. (nan)
October 11, 2022 Filing 29 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal of claims against Defendants YOUTUBE LLC and GOOGLE LLC, without prejudice by Rodina Foodstore, Inc. (Lambert, George)
October 9, 2022 Filing 28 NOTICE by Rodina Foodstore, Inc. re #1 Complaint, docketing documents received in the mail (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Individual Defendants' Answers as received) (Lambert, George)
October 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSIONS: ORDER Granting #26 Joint Motion for Extension of Time/Case Deadlines. Joint Scheduling Report due by 12/8/2022 Responses to the Complaint due by 11/24/2022 Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 10/3/2022. See attached document for full details. (nan)
September 30, 2022 Filing 26 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time of Case Deadlines re #23 Order Requiring Joint Scheduling Report, by Google LLC, YouTube LLC. Responses due by 10/14/2022 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Berman, Nathan)
September 30, 2022 Filing 25 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by RODINA FOODSTORE INC.. ANDREI ELATNIKOV served on 9/19/2022, response/answer due 10/11/2022. (Lambert, George)
September 30, 2022 Filing 24 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by RODINA FOODSTORE INC.. NADEJDA ELATNIKOVA served on 9/19/2022, response/answer due 10/11/2022. (Lambert, George)
September 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER REQUIRING JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT, CERTIFICATES OF INTERESTED PARTIES AND CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS : Joint Scheduling Report due by 10/24/2022 Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 9/20/2022. See attached document for full details. (nan)
September 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Raag Singhal recused. Case reassigned to Judge Rodney Smith and Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid for all further proceedings. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 9/19/2022. See attached document for full details. (bms)
September 16, 2022 Filing 21 Summons Issued as to NADEJDA ELATNIKOVA. (drz)
September 16, 2022 Filing 20 Summons Issued as to ANDREI ELATNIKOV. (drz)
September 16, 2022 Filing 19 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) by RODINA FOODSTORE INC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit) (Lambert, George)
September 15, 2022 Filing 17 Corporate Disclosure Statement and List of Interested Parties, by RODINA FOODSTORE INC. (Lambert, George)
September 15, 2022 Filing 16 Corporate Disclosure Statement and Certificate of Interested Persons by Google LLC, YouTube LLC identifying Corporate Parent XXVI Holdings Inc., holding company of Google LLC, Corporate Parent Alphabet Inc., holding company of XXVI Holdings Inc. for Google LLC, YouTube LLC (Berman, Nathan)
September 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER denying #7 Motion for Leave to Serve Defendants. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 9/14/2022. See attached document for full details. (amb)
September 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #14 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Answer to a Complaint or Other Case Initiating Document by Google LLC. Response/Answer due 10/10/2022. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 9/9/2022. (pb00)
September 9, 2022 Filing 14 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint, by Google LLC, YouTube LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Berman, Nathan)
September 9, 2022 Filing 13 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Nathan Michael Berman on behalf of Google LLC, YouTube LLC. Attorney Nathan Michael Berman added to party Google LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Nathan Michael Berman added to party YouTube LLC(pty:dft). (Berman, Nathan)
September 7, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE of Striking #9 Notice (Other) filed by RODINA FOODSTORE INC. by RODINA FOODSTORE INC. (Lambert, George)
September 7, 2022 Filing 10 Clerk's Notice to Filer re #9 Notice (Other). Proposed Order Docketed as Main Document; CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIRED - Filer must File a Notice of Striking, then resubmit the proposed order as instructed in the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures (drz)
September 7, 2022 SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 12 [misc] restricted/sealed until further notice. (1758010)
September 6, 2022 Filing 9 STRICKEN PER DE#11 -NOTICE by RODINA FOODSTORE INC. re 8 Order, Proposed Order (Lambert, George) Modified on 9/7/2022 (drz).
September 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 PAPERLESS ORDER directing Plaintiff to file and submit to the Court via email (singhal@flsd.uscourts.gov) a proposed order granting #7 Unopposed Motion for Leave to Serve Two Aliens Without Residential Address in U.S. by Email. See Local Rule 7.1(a)(2) (requiring submission of proposed orders with ex parte motions). The proposed order shall be filed and emailed by 9/12/2022. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 9/6/2022. (pb00)
September 5, 2022 Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION Leave to Serve Two Aliens, Without Residential Address in the U.S., by Email re #1 Complaint, by RODINA FOODSTORE INC.. (Lambert, George)
August 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER REQUIRING SCHEDULING REPORT Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 8/29/2022. See attached document for full details. (nan)
August 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 PAPERLESS ORDER TO FILE CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONSWithin SEVEN (7) DAYS of entry of an appearance, each party, including governmental parties, must file certificates of interested parties and corporate disclosure statements that contain a complete list of persons, associated persons, firms, partnerships, or corporations that have a financial interest in the outcome of this case, including subsidiaries, conglomerates, affiliates, parent corporations, and other identifiable legal entities related to a party. The parties shall not include Judge Singhal or the paired magistrate judges as interested parties unless they have an interest in the litigation. Throughout the pendency of the action, the parties are under a continuing obligation to amend, correct, and update the certificates. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 8/29/2022. (eca)
August 29, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICEUnless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion, legal memorandum, brief, and otherwise shall: be double-spaced, in justified alignment, in 12-point font, using either Times New Roman or Arial typeface. This Notice does not supplant the requirements and provisions of Local Rule 7.1(c). The Court cautions parties against excessive use of footnotes.Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions.Parties are encouraged to seek extensions of time in a timely fashion. "A motion for extension of time is not self-executing; no motion is, unless expressly provided for by the applicable rule. Yet, by filing these motions on or near the last day, and then sitting idle pending the Court's disposition of the motion, parties essentially grant their own motion. The Court will not condone this." Compere v. Nusret Miami, LLC, 2020 WL 2844888, at *2 (S.D. Fla. May 7, 2020) (internal citations omitted).Exhibits to pleadings and motions shall be docketed in accordance with the Courts CM/ECF procedures, Rule 3L.(2): (2) Describing an Attachment to a Docket EntryA party filing an attachment to a document shall select one of the prescribed attachment categories from the drop-down menu (e.g., affidavit, transcript), provide an alphabetical or numerical designation (e.g., Exhibit A, Exhibit 1), and descriptively name each attachment (e.g., Exhibit 1 - Affidavit of Boo Radley) in a manner that enables the Court to easily locate and distinguish attachments. (Emphasis added.) Local Rule 16.4, Local Rules for the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, requires that a Notice of Settlement "shall be filed and served jointly by counsel for all parties to the settlement." A unilateral notice of settlement will not stay pre-trial deadlines or hearings.Failure to comply with any of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 8/29/2022. (eca)
August 26, 2022 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Google LLC, YouTube LLC. (nan)
August 26, 2022 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Raag Singhal. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (nan)
August 26, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for injunctive relief and damages, against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15903179, filed by RODINA FOODSTORE INC.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Summon(s))(Lambert, George)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rodina Foodstore Inc. v. Elatnikov et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: RODINA FOODSTORE INC.
Represented By: George Lambert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rodina Foodstore, Inc.
Represented By: George Lambert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANDREI ELATNIKOV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NADEJDA ELATNIKOVA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: YouTube LLC
Represented By: Nathan Michael Berman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Google LLC
Represented By: Nathan Michael Berman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?