Wong v. I.Q. DATA INTERNATIONAL, INC
Plaintiff: Letan Wong
Defendant: I.Q. DATA INTERNATIONAL, INC and I.Q. Data International, Inc.
Case Number: 0:2022cv61713
Filed: September 12, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: William P Dimitrouleas
Referring Judge: Patrick M Hunt
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER granting #8 Joint Motion for Entry of Discovery Confidentiality Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patrick M. Hunt on 11/2/2022. See attached document for full details. (bse)
October 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 SCHEDULING ORDER: ( Jury Trial set for 12/18/2023 in Fort Lauderdale Division before Judge William P. Dimitrouleas., Calendar Call set for 12/15/2023 10:00 AM in Fort Lauderdale Division before Judge William P. Dimitrouleas.), ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation., and ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Patrick M. Hunt for Discovery Matters. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 10/27/2022. See attached document for full details. (ls) #Pattern Jury Instruction Builder - To access the latest, up to date changes to the 11th Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions go to https://pji.ca11.uscourts.gov or click here.
October 27, 2022 Filing 11 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 26(f) by Letan Wong (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Schedule Proposed by the Parties, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Scheduling Order)(Salazar, Omar)
October 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE why this case should not be Dismissed for Failure to follow this Court's Order or File a ( Joint Scheduling Report by 11/2/2022). Show Cause Response due by 11/2/2022. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 10/26/2022. See attached document for full details. (ls)
October 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Order Referring Motion and Discovery: #8 Joint MOTION Joint Motion for Entry of Discovery Confidentiality Order filed by I.Q. Data International, Inc.. All Discovery is Referred to United States Magistrate Judge Patrick M. Hunt. Motions referred to Judge Patrick M. Hunt. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 10/25/2022. See attached document for full details. (pc)
October 25, 2022 Filing 8 Joint MOTION Joint Motion for Entry of Discovery Confidentiality Order by I.Q. Data International, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Discovery Confidentiality Order)(Kahle, Douglas)
September 21, 2022 Filing 7 Clerk's Notice to Filer re #4 Affidavit. Wrong Event Selected; ERROR - The Filer selected the wrong event. The document was re-docketed by the Clerk, see [de#6]. It is not necessary to refile this document. (ls)
September 20, 2022 Filing 5 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint re the Notice of Removal and Request for Attorney's Fees and Costs by I.Q. DATA INTERNATIONAL, INC. (Kahle, Douglas)
September 14, 2022 Filing 6 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Letan Wong. I.Q. Data International, Inc. served on 9/1/2022, response/answer due 9/22/2022. (ls)(See Image at DE #4 )
September 14, 2022 Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT Verified Return of Service signed by: Niel Young by Letan Wong (Salazar, Omar)
September 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Order Requiring Joint Scheduling Report. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 9/13/2022. See attached document for full details. (ls)
September 12, 2022 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge William P. Dimitrouleas. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Patrick M. Hunt is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (nan)
September 12, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Letan Wong v. I.Q. Data International, Inc.) Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15941296, filed by I.Q. DATA INTERNATIONAL, INC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - State Court Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, No Answer/Motion to Dismiss filed.)(Kahle, Douglas) Modified Attachment Descriptions on 9/13/2022 (nan).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wong v. I.Q. DATA INTERNATIONAL, INC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Letan Wong
Represented By: Omar Mauricio Salazar, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: I.Q. DATA INTERNATIONAL, INC
Represented By: Douglas A. Kahle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: I.Q. Data International, Inc.
Represented By: Douglas A. Kahle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?