Betancourt v. Pallar, L.C. et al
| Rudolph Betancourt |
| Pallar, L.C. and Epic Restaurant Group, Inc. doing business as Oceans 234 |
| 0:2022cv61728 |
| September 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Aileen M Cannon |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER REQUIRING JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT AND CERTIFICATES OF INTERESTED PARTIES. Joint Scheduling Report and Certificates of Interested Parties and Corporate Disclosure Statements due by 11/15/2022. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 10/25/2022. See attached document for full details. (swr)
|
| Filing 11 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint by Epic Restaurant Group, Inc., Pallar, L.C.. (Johnson, Kevin) |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of Counsel Verified Certificate of Counsel RE: Prior Filings Under the ADA by Glenn R Goldstein on behalf of Rudolph Betancourt (Goldstein, Glenn) |
| Reset Response/Answer Due Deadline: Epic Restaurant Group, Inc. response/answer due 10/24/2022; Pallar, L.C. response/answer due 10/24/2022. PER DE# 9 (cds) |
|
Filing 9
PAPERLESS ORDER granting in part and denying in part #8 Defendants' Motion for an Extension of Time. On or before October 24, 2022, the Defendants shall file a combined response or individual answers to the Complaint #1 . Moving forward, any requests for extension must be filed sufficiently in advance of the deadline at issue. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 10/9/2022. (aes)
|
| Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint by Epic Restaurant Group, Inc., Pallar, L.C.. Attorney Kevin David Johnson added to party Epic Restaurant Group, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Kevin David Johnson added to party Pallar, L.C.(pty:dft). (Johnson, Kevin) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Rudolph Betancourt. Epic Restaurant Group, Inc. served on 9/16/2022, response/answer due 10/7/2022. (Goldstein, Glenn) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Rudolph Betancourt. Pallar, L.C. served on 9/16/2022, response/answer due 10/7/2022. (Goldstein, Glenn) |
| Filing 5 Plaintiff's Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by Rudolph Betancourt (Goldstein, Glenn) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER REQUIRING COMBINED RESPONSES. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 9/19/2022. See attached document for full details. (scn)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Epic Restaurant Group, Inc., Pallar, L.C.. (swr) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Aileen M. Cannon. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Patrick M. Hunt is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (swr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Epic Restaurant Group, Inc., Pallar, L.C.. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15945738, filed by Rudolph Betancourt. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Summon(s))(Goldstein, Glenn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
