Caplan v. Deerfield Beach Collision, Inc. et al
| Howard Michael Caplan |
| DEERFIELD BEACH COLLISION, INC. and JOSEPH ROMANO, INC. |
| 0:2022cv61823 |
| September 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Raag Singhal |
| Alicia O Valle |
| Civil Rights: Accommodations |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
SCHEDULING ORDER: ( Jury Trial set for 7/31/2023 09:00 AM in Fort Lauderdale Division before Judge Raag Singhal., Calendar Call set for 7/28/2023 10:00 AM in Fort Lauderdale Division before Judge Raag Singhal., Status Conference set for 1/13/2023 12:00 PM in Fort Lauderdale Division before Judge Raag Singhal., Amended Pleadings due by 1/6/2023., Discovery due by 4/7/2023., Expert Discovery due by 4/7/2023., Joinder of Parties due by 1/6/2023., Mediation Deadline 4/14/2023., In Limine Motions due by 4/21/2023., Dispositive Motions due by 4/21/2023., Motions due by 4/21/2023., Pretrial Stipulation due by 7/18/2023.), ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation., ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle for Discovery Matters. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 11/10/2022. See attached document for full details. (ls) #Pattern Jury Instruction Builder - To access the latest, up to date changes to the 11th Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions go to https://pji.ca11.uscourts.gov or click here.
|
| Filing 14 Defendants' ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint by Deerfield Beach Collision, Inc., Joseph Romano, Inc.. (Stibolt, Dori) |
| Reset Response/Answer Due Deadline per DE#13: Deerfield Beach Collision, Inc. response/answer due 11/4/2022; Joseph Romano, Inc. response/answer due 11/4/2022. (scn) |
|
Filing 13
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Answer to a Complaint or Other Case Initiating Document. Response/Answer due 11/4/2022. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 10/21/2022. (eca)
|
| Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time to Serve a Response to Plaintiff's Complaint re #1 Complaint, by Deerfield Beach Collision, Inc., Joseph Romano, Inc.. Attorney Dori Katrine Stibolt added to party Deerfield Beach Collision, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Dori Katrine Stibolt added to party Joseph Romano, Inc.(pty:dft). Responses due by 11/2/2022 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Stibolt, Dori) |
| Filing 11 Clerk's Notice to Filer re #9 Summons Returned Executed,. Incorrect Service Date Entered; ERROR - The incorrect service date was entered. The correction was made by the Clerk and filing was re-docketed, see [de#10]. It is not necessary to refile this document. (ls) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Howard Michael Caplan. Joseph Romano, Inc. served on 10/10/2022, response/answer due 10/31/2022. (ls)(See Image at DE #9 ) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Howard Michael Caplan. JOSEPH ROMANO, INC. served on 10/11/2022, response/answer due 11/1/2022. (Stern, Ronald) |
| Filing 8 Plaintiff's Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by Howard Michael Caplan (Stern, Ronald) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Howard Michael Caplan. DEERFIELD BEACH COLLISION, INC. served on 9/28/2022, response/answer due 10/19/2022. (Stern, Ronald) |
|
Filing 6
PAPERLESS ORDER TO FILE CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONSWithin SEVEN (7) DAYS of entry of an appearance, each party, including governmental parties, must file certificates of interested parties and corporate disclosure statements that contain a complete list of persons, associated persons, firms, partnerships, or corporations that have a financial interest in the outcome of this case, including subsidiaries, conglomerates, affiliates, parent corporations, and other identifiable legal entities related to a party. The parties shall not include Judge Singhal or the paired magistrate judges as interested parties unless they have an interest in the litigation. Throughout the pendency of the action, the parties are under a continuing obligation to amend, correct, and update the certificates. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 9/29/2022. (eca)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICEUnless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion, legal memorandum, brief, and otherwise shall: be double-spaced, in justified alignment, in 12-point font, using either Times New Roman or Arial typeface. This Notice does not supplant the requirements and provisions of Local Rule 7.1(c). The Court cautions parties against excessive use of footnotes.Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions.Parties are encouraged to seek extensions of time in a timely fashion. "A motion for extension of time is not self-executing; no motion is, unless expressly provided for by the applicable rule. Yet, by filing these motions on or near the last day, and then sitting idle pending the Court's disposition of the motion, parties essentially grant their own motion. The Court will not condone this." Compere v. Nusret Miami, LLC, 2020 WL 2844888, at *2 (S.D. Fla. May 7, 2020) (internal citations omitted).Exhibits to pleadings and motions shall be docketed in accordance with the Courts CM/ECF procedures, Rule 3L.(2): (2) Describing an Attachment to a Docket EntryA party filing an attachment to a document shall select one of the prescribed attachment categories from the drop-down menu (e.g., affidavit, transcript), provide an alphabetical or numerical designation (e.g., Exhibit A, Exhibit 1), and descriptively name each attachment (e.g., Exhibit 1 - Affidavit of Boo Radley) in a manner that enables the Court to easily locate and distinguish attachments. (Emphasis added.) Local Rule 16.4, Local Rules for the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, requires that a Notice of Settlement "shall be filed and served jointly by counsel for all parties to the settlement." A unilateral notice of settlement will not stay pre-trial deadlines or hearings.Failure to comply with any of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 9/29/2022. (eca) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Ronnette Gleizer on behalf of Howard Michael Caplan. Attorney Ronnette Gleizer added to party Howard Michael Caplan(pty:pla). (Gleizer, Ronnette) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to DEERFIELD BEACH COLLISION, INC., JOSEPH ROMANO, INC.. (nan) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Raag Singhal. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Melissa Damian is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (nan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15980847, filed by Howard Michael Caplan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Summon(s))(Stern, Ronald) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
