Kiertekles v. Tanenbaum Harber of Florida, LLC
Plaintiff: Carol Kiertekles
Defendant: Tanenbaum Harber of Florida, LLC
Case Number: 0:2022cv61827
Filed: September 28, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Raag Singhal
Referring Judge: Alicia O Valle
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1443 cv Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Cases
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 19, 2022 Filing 11 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint re the Notice of Removal with Jury Demand by Tanenbaum Harber of Florida, LLC. (Updike, Jenna)
October 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER SETTING TRIAL AND PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULE, REQUIRING MEDIATION, AND REFERRING CERTAIN MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Jury Trial set for 12/4/2023 9:00 AM in Fort Lauderdale Division before Judge Raag Singhal. Calendar Call set for 12/1/2023 10:00 AM in Fort Lauderdale Division before Judge Raag Singhal. Status Conference set for 12/16/2022 10:00 AM in Fort Lauderdale Division before Judge Raag Singhal. Amended Pleadings due by 12/18/2022. Discovery due by 8/10/2023. Expert Discovery due by 8/10/2023. Fact Discovery due by 8/10/2023. Joinder of Parties due by 12/18/2022. Mediation Deadline 8/17/2023. In Limine Motions due by 8/25/2023. Dispositive Motions due by 8/25/2023. Motions due by 8/25/2023. Pretrial Stipulation due by 11/21/2023 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation. Mediation Deadline 8/17/2023. ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle for Discovery Matters. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 10/19/2022. See attached document for full details. (mab) #Pattern Jury Instruction Builder - To access the latest, up to date changes to the 11th Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions go to https://pji.ca11.uscourts.gov or click here.
October 18, 2022 Filing 9 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 26(f) by Carol Kiertekles (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Scheduling Order)(Gonzalez, Juliana)
October 4, 2022 Filing 8 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by Tanenbaum Harber of Florida, LLC (Updike, Jenna)
October 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER REQUIRING SCHEDULING REPORT. Joint Scheduling Report due by 10/18/2022. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 10/3/2022. See attached document for full details. (mee)
October 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 PAPERLESS ORDER TO FILE CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONSWithin SEVEN (7) DAYS of entry of an appearance, each party, including governmental parties, must file certificates of interested parties and corporate disclosure statements that contain a complete list of persons, associated persons, firms, partnerships, or corporations that have a financial interest in the outcome of this case, including subsidiaries, conglomerates, affiliates, parent corporations, and other identifiable legal entities related to a party. The parties shall not include Judge Singhal or the paired magistrate judges as interested parties unless they have an interest in the litigation. Throughout the pendency of the action, the parties are under a continuing obligation to amend, correct, and update the certificates. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 10/3/2022. (pls)
October 3, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICEUnless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion, legal memorandum, brief, and otherwise shall: be double-spaced, in justified alignment, in 12-point font, using either Times New Roman or Arial typeface. This Notice does not supplant the requirements and provisions of Local Rule 7.1(c). The Court cautions parties against excessive use of footnotes.Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions.Parties are encouraged to seek extensions of time in a timely fashion. "A motion for extension of time is not self-executing; no motion is, unless expressly provided for by the applicable rule. Yet, by filing these motions on or near the last day, and then sitting idle pending the Court's disposition of the motion, parties essentially grant their own motion. The Court will not condone this." Compere v. Nusret Miami, LLC, 2020 WL 2844888, at *2 (S.D. Fla. May 7, 2020) (internal citations omitted).Exhibits to pleadings and motions shall be docketed in accordance with the Courts CM/ECF procedures, Rule 3L.(2): (2) Describing an Attachment to a Docket EntryA party filing an attachment to a document shall select one of the prescribed attachment categories from the drop-down menu (e.g., affidavit, transcript), provide an alphabetical or numerical designation (e.g., Exhibit A, Exhibit 1), and descriptively name each attachment (e.g., Exhibit 1 - Affidavit of Boo Radley) in a manner that enables the Court to easily locate and distinguish attachments. (Emphasis added.) Local Rule 16.4, Local Rules for the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, requires that a Notice of Settlement "shall be filed and served jointly by counsel for all parties to the settlement." A unilateral notice of settlement will not stay pre-trial deadlines or hearings.Failure to comply with any of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 10/3/2022. (pls)
September 30, 2022 Filing 4 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by Carol Kiertekles (Gonzalez, Juliana)
September 30, 2022 Filing 3 Clerk's Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Documents Improperly Arranged. The Filer did not properly attach the Civil Cover Sheet and State Documents. Future filings must comply with the CM/ECF Civil Case Opening Guide. It is not necessary to re-file this document. (cds)
September 28, 2022 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Raag Singhal. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Melissa Damian is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (cds)
September 28, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Disability Discrimination Complaint) Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15984217, filed by Tanenbaum Harber of Florida, LLC.(Updike, Jenna) Modified Text on 9/30/2022 (cds). No Answer/Motion To Dismiss File.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kiertekles v. Tanenbaum Harber of Florida, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carol Kiertekles
Represented By: Juliana Gonzalez
Represented By: Lawrence Joseph McGuinness
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tanenbaum Harber of Florida, LLC
Represented By: Jenna Marie Updike
Represented By: Craig Christopher Minko
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?