CUSTOM PIPE DESIGN, INC. v. A 2022 43' FREEMAN Hull no. IGG43006A222 et al
Plaintiff: CUSTOM PIPE DESIGN, INC.
Defendant: A 2022 43' FREEMAN Hull no. IGG43006A222 and BRENDA HAMILTON
Claimant: Agua Azul Assets, LLC
Case Number: 0:2022cv62019
Filed: October 26, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Raag Singhal
Nature of Suit: Contract: Marine
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 Admiralty
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 2, 2022 Filing 10 Plaintiff's Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement Plaintiff's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement by CUSTOM PIPE DESIGN, INC. (Foreman, Zachary)
November 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 PAPERLESS ORDER TO FILE CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONSWithin SEVEN (7) DAYS of entry of an appearance, each party, including governmental parties, must file certificates of interested parties and corporate disclosure statements that contain a complete list of persons, associated persons, firms, partnerships, or corporations that have a financial interest in the outcome of this case, including subsidiaries, conglomerates, affiliates, parent corporations, and other identifiable legal entities related to a party. The parties shall not include Judge Singhal or the paired magistrate judges as interested parties unless they have an interest in the litigation. Throughout the pendency of the action, the parties are under a continuing obligation to amend, correct, and update the certificates. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 11/1/2022. (pls)
November 1, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICEUnless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion, legal memorandum, brief, and otherwise shall: be double-spaced, in justified alignment, in 12-point font, using either Times New Roman or Arial typeface. This Notice does not supplant the requirements and provisions of Local Rule 7.1(c). The Court cautions parties against excessive use of footnotes.Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions.Parties are encouraged to seek extensions of time in a timely fashion. "A motion for extension of time is not self-executing; no motion is, unless expressly provided for by the applicable rule. Yet, by filing these motions on or near the last day, and then sitting idle pending the Court's disposition of the motion, parties essentially grant their own motion. The Court will not condone this." Compere v. Nusret Miami, LLC, 2020 WL 2844888, at *2 (S.D. Fla. May 7, 2020) (internal citations omitted).Exhibits to pleadings and motions shall be docketed in accordance with the Courts CM/ECF procedures, Rule 3L.(2): (2) Describing an Attachment to a Docket EntryA party filing an attachment to a document shall select one of the prescribed attachment categories from the drop-down menu (e.g., affidavit, transcript), provide an alphabetical or numerical designation (e.g., Exhibit A, Exhibit 1), and descriptively name each attachment (e.g., Exhibit 1 - Affidavit of Boo Radley) in a manner that enables the Court to easily locate and distinguish attachments. (Emphasis added.) Local Rule 16.4, Local Rules for the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, requires that a Notice of Settlement "shall be filed and served jointly by counsel for all parties to the settlement." A unilateral notice of settlement will not stay pre-trial deadlines or hearings.Failure to comply with any of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 11/1/2022. (pls)
October 31, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE of Change of Address, Email or Law Firm Name by Zachary Lincoln Foreman (Foreman, Zachary)
October 31, 2022 Filing 6 Amended Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Raag Singhal. Judge Darrin P. Gayles no longer assigned to case. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (nwn)
October 28, 2022 Case Reopened (nwn)
October 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #4 Plaintiff's Motion to Transfer Venue. The Clerk of Court is directed to reassign this action to the Fort Lauderdale Division and venue by random assignment. This Miami Division venue case shall be closed, and all further matters will be filed under the case assigned in the Fort Lauderdale Division and venue. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (bhy)
October 27, 2022 Filing 4 Plaintiff's MOTION to Change Venue by CUSTOM PIPE DESIGN, INC.. Responses due by 11/10/2022 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Amended Verified Complaint, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Foreman, Zachary)
October 26, 2022 Filing 3 Clerk's Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Venue on the Civil Cover Sheet does not match the initiating document. The Clerks Office confirmed Miami-Dade (Office - Miami) as the county with the filer. It is not necessary to re-file this document. (nwn)
October 26, 2022 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Darrin P. Gayles. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (nwn)
October 26, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT VERIFIED COMPLAINT against A 2022 43' FREEMAN Hull no. IGG43006A222, in rem, BRENDA HAMILTON, in personam. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-16053298, filed by CUSTOM PIPE DESIGN, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Estimate, #2 Exhibit B - Outstanding Invoices, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Foreman, Zachary)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CUSTOM PIPE DESIGN, INC. v. A 2022 43' FREEMAN Hull no. IGG43006A222 et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CUSTOM PIPE DESIGN, INC.
Represented By: Jeffrey Eric Foreman
Represented By: Zachary Lincoln Foreman
Represented By: Noah Daniel Silverman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: A 2022 43' FREEMAN Hull no. IGG43006A222
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BRENDA HAMILTON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Claimant: Agua Azul Assets, LLC
Represented By: Adam B. Cooke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?