Accelerant Specialty Insurance Company v. Klotz et al
| Accelerant Specialty Insurance Company |
| Radford Klotz and J. Taylor Klotz |
| 0:2022cv62292 |
| December 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Darrin P Gayles |
| Contract: Marine |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgment |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 SUGGESTION OF DEATH as to J. Taylor Klotz by Radford Klotz (Fornaro, Matthew) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint with Jury Demand , COUNTERCLAIM against Accelerant Specialty Insurance Company by Radford Klotz. (Fornaro, Matthew) |
| Set/Reset Response/Answer Due Deadline: J. Taylor Klotz response/answer due 1/31/2023; Radford Klotz response/answer due 1/31/2023. Per DE 9 Order. (ebz) |
Filing 9
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendants shall respond to the Complaint on or before January 31, 2023. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (hs01)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint, by J. Taylor Klotz, Radford Klotz. (Fornaro, Matthew) |
|
Filing 7
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendants shall respond to the Complaint on or before January 24, 2023. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (hs01)
|
| Set/Reset Response/Answer Due Deadline: J. Taylor Klotz response/answer due 1/24/2023; Radford Klotz response/answer due 1/24/2023. Per DE 7 Order. (ebz) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to respond to complaint re #1 Complaint, by J. Taylor Klotz, Radford Klotz. Responses due by 1/23/2023 (Fornaro, Matthew) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Matthew Fornaro on behalf of J. Taylor Klotz, Radford Klotz. Attorney Matthew Fornaro added to party J. Taylor Klotz(pty:dft), Attorney Matthew Fornaro added to party Radford Klotz(pty:dft). (Fornaro, Matthew) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE. Unless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion shall be double-spaced in Times New Roman 12-point typeface. Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions. Failure to comply with ANY of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including but not limited to, the striking of the motion or dismissal of this action. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (hs01) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to J. Taylor Klotz, Radford Klotz. (rbe) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Darrin P. Gayles. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (rbe) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against J. Taylor Klotz, Radford Klotz. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-16154036, filed by Accelerant Specialty Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A. Redacted Temporary Binder, #2 Exhibit B. Survey, #3 Exhibit C. LOC, #4 Summon(s) Proposed Summons, #5 Summon(s) Proposed Summons, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(Davant, Charles) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
